atom feed9 messages in net.sourceforge.lists.net-snmp-codersRE: Setting IP address through SNMP
FromSent OnAttachments
basi...@wipro.comNov 24, 2011 4:09 am 
Dave ShieldNov 24, 2011 4:55 am 
basi...@wipro.comNov 24, 2011 6:15 am 
Dave ShieldNov 24, 2011 6:28 am 
Dave ShieldNov 24, 2011 6:34 am 
basi...@wipro.comNov 24, 2011 9:00 pm 
Magnus FromreideNov 24, 2011 10:28 pm 
basi...@wipro.comNov 24, 2011 10:54 pm 
basi...@wipro.comNov 25, 2011 12:55 am 
Subject:RE: Setting IP address through SNMP
From:Magnus Fromreide (mag@lysator.liu.se)
Date:Nov 24, 2011 10:28:37 pm
List:net.sourceforge.lists.net-snmp-coders

On Fri, 2011-11-25 at 10:31 +0530, basi@wipro.com wrote:

Hi,

OK I understand that these two values to be set in a single set command. But it still gives the bad value name error.

[root@localhost ~]# snmpset -v 2c -c public 10.20.20.20 ipAddressIfIndex.ipv4.4.10.10.10.30 = 3 ipAddressStatus.ipv4.4.10.10.10.30 = createAndGo ipAddressStatus.ipv4.4.10.10.10.30: Bad value name (createAndGo)

And I tried with the integer equivalent of createAndGo (4) also

[root@localhost ~]# snmpset -v 2c -c public 10.20.20.20 ipAddressIfIndex.ipv4.4.10.10.10.30 = 3 ipAddressStatus.ipv4.4.10.10.10.30 = 4 Error in packet. Reason: wrongValue (The set value is illegal or unsupported in some way) Failed object: IP-MIB::ipAddressStatus.ipv4."10.10.10.30"

And destroy is also giving bad value name error.

Try with ipAddressRowStatus instead of ipAddressStatus.

/MF

------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d