9 messages in net.sourceforge.lists.courier-maildropRe: [maildropl] Maildrop and UID/GID ...
FromSent OnAttachments
Nathan FrankishJul 1, 2007 4:48 am 
moussJul 1, 2007 2:12 pm 
Nathan FrankishJul 1, 2007 6:35 pm 
Devin RubiaJul 3, 2007 7:01 am 
Tony EarnshawJul 4, 2007 1:32 am 
Nathan FrankishJul 4, 2007 1:45 am 
Tony EarnshawJul 4, 2007 1:51 am 
Sam VarshavchikJul 4, 2007 5:45 am 
Tony EarnshawJul 4, 2007 6:35 am 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:Re: [maildropl] Maildrop and UID/GID SettingsActions...
From:mouss (mlis@free.fr)
Date:Jul 1, 2007 2:12:03 pm
List:net.sourceforge.lists.courier-maildrop

Nathan Frankish wrote:

Howdy everyone.

Im trying to work out if courier-maildrop honours the information that is gathered using the courier-authdaemon.

My setup is something along these lines Courier-imap/pop using courier authdaemon (mysql) as the backend. I use postfix as the smtp server, and currently uses virtual users for mail storage, however my virtual users do link to specific UID/GID's on the system. Ie all of the same domain have the same UID/GID etc.

Is there a reason not to use a single uid/gid for all (virtual) mail? while I see the benefits of per recipient uid/gid as well as those for a single uid/gid for all mail, I can hardly see the benefits of a "half the way" system.

I plan on having Postfix as the smtp server, and then pass off to courier-maildrop so i can perform server side filtering. As obviously i want my mail to be stored with the correct owner/group id, i just want to confirm that in a setup like this, courier-maildrop will write the mail files using the UID/GID.

as far as maildrop can deliver to the right directories, it's ok. if not using a single uid for the whole mailstore, maildrop should be setuid (the alternative of making it a membre of the groups and giving write access is horrible).

Any information would be appreciated.