18 messages in com.mysql.lists.plusplusRe: Problems with timestamp
FromSent OnAttachments
Королев Илья16 Oct 2006 05:57 
Warren Young16 Oct 2006 17:36 
Королев Илья17 Oct 2006 00:34 
Warren Young17 Oct 2006 01:46 
Королев Илья17 Oct 2006 02:05 
Warren Young17 Oct 2006 03:12 
Королев Илья17 Oct 2006 03:26 
Warren Young17 Oct 2006 05:03 
Королев Илья17 Oct 2006 06:24 
Warren Young18 Oct 2006 05:20 
Королев Илья18 Oct 2006 06:40 
Warren Young18 Oct 2006 11:34 
Королев Илья24 Oct 2006 01:20 
Warren Young24 Oct 2006 14:39 
Королев Илья24 Oct 2006 22:39 
Warren Young25 Oct 2006 05:13 
Королев Илья20 Nov 2006 03:10 
Warren Young20 Nov 2006 11:32 
Subject:Re: Problems with timestamp
From:Королев Илья (bre@begun.ru)
Date:10/17/2006 12:34:52 AM
List:com.mysql.lists.plusplus

in <mysql++/sql_types.h> there are such lines ... typedef Time sql_timestamp; ...

I guess it _really_ incorrect, it should be at least ... typedef DateTime sql_timestamp; ...

That is just historical. We can't change it without a risk of breaking existing code. But, I have placed your proposed fix on the v3.0 section of the Wishlist. That would be the earliest point we could contemplate changing it.

hm... Can you give me a example of using sql_timestamp? IMHO it can't be used as a real timestamp, so it really hard to me to imagine such example.

Again about SSQLS and static members. I've made a version of custom.pl - which lives without static members, it creates custom_no_static.h and custom_no_static-macros.h files. I guess it may be useful.

You shouldn't need that any more with the most recent two versions of MySQL++. Do they not solve the problem for you?

Is it in SVN? I'll try it

why DateTime isn't a descendant of Date & Time?

Let's imagine that it is. In such case I can easily truncate info about Time and send just a Date. May be it isn't a really common case, but it would be handily to me :)

PS Don't pay attention to my straightforward phrases - it just becouse of ugly English :)