HI all,
I'm just back from a series of trips and will try to respond to some of the
pile-up of undealt-with messages in the Pd list..
I'm struggling with the score-following issue as well. Dannenberg's patent
expires in
a year, and at teh moment the easiest thing to do might be just to
wait. While at IRCAM, before the Dannenberg patent came out but after his
paper, I worked out a fairly powerful score follower, using his ideas and
some of my own, which I'm eager to put in other peoples' hands now.
cheers
Miller
On Fri, Oct 12, 2001 at 04:30:42PM +0200, Krzysztof Czaja wrote:
puk, puk... jest tam kto?
How about score following in Pd?
I suspect, that since the famous Dannenberg algorithm is patented,
it is probably better to restrain from cooking any smart solution
for a while. On the other hand the follow in max is so dumb and
obvious, that it is hard to imagine how designing some variant of
follow might cause any legal trouble. If this is `right path to
follow', I will do the coding.
Anyway, looking forward to any advice here.
Krzysztof
2 messages in at.iem.pd-listRe: [PD] what is the right path to fo...
