8 messages in net.sourceforge.lists.courier-usersRe: [courier-users] Re: courierfax an...
FromSent OnAttachments
Grzegorz JanoszkaApr 14, 2004 11:36 am 
cour...@gmx.netApr 14, 2004 12:43 pm 
Grzegorz JanoszkaApr 14, 2004 1:50 pm 
Jason FlattApr 14, 2004 4:20 pm 
Sam VarshavchikApr 14, 2004 4:20 pm 
Grzegorz JanoszkaApr 14, 2004 11:21 pm 
Grzegorz JanoszkaApr 14, 2004 11:24 pm 
Stefan HornburgApr 15, 2004 1:22 am 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:Re: [courier-users] Re: courierfax and courieruucpActions...
From:Grzegorz Janoszka (Grze@pro.onet.pl)
Date:Apr 14, 2004 11:24:43 pm
List:net.sourceforge.lists.courier-users

On Wed, 14 Apr 2004, Sam Varshavchik wrote:

That's not what he said, but in any case what is exactly the problem with courierfax and courieruucp? They are relatively small; neither one of them will do anything without explicit configuration, so they will be quickly swapped out, and they will quietly live out their lives in some small corner of the swap file, not bothering anyone.

There is no problem with these modules, I have just wondered if I can make them not loaded when I start courier.

Thanks for your help.

-- Grzegorz Janoszka