16 messages in com.googlegroups.sqlalchemy[sqlalchemy] Re: SQLAlchemy 0.4 MERGE...
FromSent OnAttachments
Michael Bayer26 Jul 2007 21:36 
svilen27 Jul 2007 05:26 
michael27 Jul 2007 06:15 
svilen27 Jul 2007 07:48 
Michael Bayer27 Jul 2007 09:39 
Jonathan Ellis27 Jul 2007 09:48 
sdob...@sistechnology.com27 Jul 2007 13:38 
sdob...@sistechnology.com29 Jul 2007 03:55 
Michael Pearson29 Jul 2007 22:46 
Michael Bayer30 Jul 2007 07:03 
Jonathan Ellis30 Jul 2007 10:21 
Michael Bayer30 Jul 2007 10:38 
Jorge Godoy30 Jul 2007 14:50 
Michael Bayer31 Jul 2007 07:33 
Marco Mariani31 Jul 2007 07:37 
Jorge Godoy31 Jul 2007 18:44 
Subject:[sqlalchemy] Re: SQLAlchemy 0.4 MERGED TO TRUNK
From:Jonathan Ellis (jona@utahpython.org)
Date:07/30/2007 10:21:49 AM
List:com.googlegroups.sqlalchemy

I can probably do this tonight.

How many people are still using 2.3? Decorator syntax would be nice for this.

Also it would be nice to not have to remember that I can't use genexps in SA code.

But 2.3 is a pretty good base, I don't miss much else from 2.4. :)

On 7/30/07, Michael Bayer <mike@zzzcomputing.com> wrote:

ive considered this so if someone is willing to submit a patch that would be great.

On Jul 30, 2007, at 1:46 AM, Michael Pearson wrote:

Hi,

Are there plans to print warnings when deprecated methods are used?

I've just spent the morning future-proofing our code against SA 0.4 and would have found this useful. I may attempt a patch myself, if people agree that it'd be a good idea.

Regards,