| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Concepcion | Jul 11, 2011 4:55 pm | |
| Hans-Christoph Steiner | Jul 11, 2011 7:01 pm | |
| martin brinkmann | Jul 12, 2011 1:21 pm | .zip |
| Jeffrey Concepcion | Jul 12, 2011 2:56 pm | |
| Jeffrey Concepcion | Jul 13, 2011 6:00 pm | |
| Hans-Christoph Steiner | Jul 13, 2011 9:26 pm | |
| Jeffrey Concepcion | Jul 16, 2011 11:48 am | |
| Hans-Christoph Steiner | Jul 16, 2011 1:58 pm |
| Subject: | Re: [PD] Tone-Cluster Patch anyone? | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | martin brinkmann (mn...@martin-brinkmann.de) | |
| Date: | Jul 12, 2011 1:21:28 pm | |
| List: | at.iem.pd-list | |
| Attachments: | ![]() clustersynth1.zip - 5k | |
On 07/12/2011 01:55 AM, Jeffrey Concepcion wrote:
Also, it seems to me that I would need one oscillator per note, which is ridiculous if you want to make something isn't that CPU intensive.
it depends on the cpu. i have made a 'quick and dirty' cluster-synth patch (attached) with 192 not very (or at all) optimized oscillators, which produces about 20 percent load on my machine (3 ghz intel core). it should run on a atom-netbook. if you need more instances, it might be too much though. (and less voices do not sound that awful too...)
another possible approach i can think of would be using ifft as a oscillator bank. though it is probably not trivial to calculate the spectrum. (or you will have to use a very large blocksize, to get enough 'frequency-resolution')
bis denn! martin
_______________________________________________
Pd-l...@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list






.zip