7 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.security-servicesRe: [security-services] Groups -sstc-...| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| ari....@oracle.com | Feb 13, 2007 8:55 am | |
| Tom Scavo | Feb 26, 2007 12:18 pm | |
| Ari Kermaier | Feb 26, 2007 1:38 pm | |
| Tom Scavo | Feb 26, 2007 2:26 pm | |
| Greg Whitehead | Feb 26, 2007 2:45 pm | |
| Ari Kermaier | Feb 26, 2007 3:14 pm | |
| Tom Scavo | Feb 26, 2007 3:21 pm |
| Subject: | Re: [security-services] Groups -sstc-saml-x509-authn-attrib-profile-draft-11-diff.pdf uploaded | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Greg Whitehead (greg...@hp.com) | |
| Date: | Feb 26, 2007 2:45:32 pm | |
| List: | org.oasis-open.lists.security-services | |
It may be helpful to read: http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/security-services/200612/msg00053.html
My understanding is that
a) we have two parallel revisions, cd-02 and draft-10, that were both based on cd-01
b) we're trying to merge useful stuff from the draft-10 "fork" into cd-02 "fork" (and for better or worse, that new revision is called draft-11)
Of course, I could be horribly confused at this point too.
-Greg
On 2/26/07 4:26 PM, "Tom Scavo" <trsc...@gmail.com> wrote:
Well, it appears the text of draft-11 originated from draft-10 (just by eyeballing it) so in that case why shouldn't the diff be taken from draft-10?
I guess the real question is: did you start with cd-02 or draft-10? The latter appears to be the case, but if you did in fact begin with cd-02, then why aren't you calling this draft-09?
Tom
On 2/26/07, Ari Kermaier <ari....@oracle.com> wrote:
No, we decided that draft-11 would incorporate comments from draft-10, but would be based on cd-02 to make it easier to limit the changes in document structure. ::Ari
-----Original Message----- From: Tom Scavo [mailto:trsc...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 3:18 PM To: ari....@oracle.com Cc: secu...@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [security-services] Groups - sstc-saml-x509-authn-attrib-profile-draft-11-diff.pdf uploaded
If you look at this diff closely, you'll see that it jumps abruptly from section 2.1 to section 3.1, which totally throws off the numbering subsequently. Moreover, the diff is against the wrong document, I believe. Shouldn't the diff be against draft-10? I've read over draft-11 carefully, and it seems the text is derived from draft-10 (as it should) so shouldn't the diff be against draft-10 (instead of cd-02)?
Thanks, Tom Scavo NCSA/University of Illinois
On 13 Feb 2007 16:55:32 -0000, ari....@oracle.com <ari....@oracle.com> wrote:
The document revision named sstc-saml-x509-authn-attrib-profile-draft-11-diff.pdf has been submitted by Ari Kermaier to the OASIS Security Services (SAML) TC document repository. This document is revision #1 of sstc-saml-x509-authn-attrib-profile-draft-11-diff.pdf.
Document Description: Working draft incorporating comments following CD-01 of this document.
View Document Details:
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/security/document.php?document_i d=22396
Download Document: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/security/download.php/22396/sst c-saml-x509-authn-attrib-profile-draft-11-diff.pdf
Revision: This document is revision #1 of sstc-saml-x509-authn-attrib-profile-draft-11-diff.pdf. The document details page referenced above will show the complete revision history.
PLEASE NOTE: If the above links do not work for you, your email application may be breaking the link into two pieces. You may be able to copy and paste the entire link address into the address field of your web browser.
-OASIS Open Administration