On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 12:41:04PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote:
Just a small question: Wouldn't it be a good idea to put
each RC under its own subdirectory in ISO-IMAGES, too?
I don't think so, but it has been brought up before..
I don't want people to glance at a '4.9' directory along with 4.8,
4.7, etc.. until we actually have something called 4.9 release.
Relying on users to actually look inside the directory and see that we
only have RCs and not the final release is I think asking too much.
The subdirectory should be called "4.9-RC2", of course,
not just "4.9". And for the actual release, it should
be called "4.9-RELEASE". Exactly like the directory names
of the FTP install trees.
Currently, there is a significant inconsistency, which
needs to be fixed. IMO.
Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co KG, Oettingenstr. 2, 80538 M?nchen
Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author
and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way.
"It combines all the worst aspects of C and Lisp: a billion different
sublanguages in one monolithic executable. It combines the power of C
with the readability of PostScript."
-- Jamie Zawinski, when asked: "What's wrong with perl?"