14 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-hubs4.9-RC2 is on ftp-master..| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Murray Stokely | Oct 8, 2003 2:48 am | |
| Oliver Fromme | Oct 8, 2003 3:43 am | |
| João Carlos Mendes Luís | Oct 8, 2003 5:24 am | |
| João Carlos Mendes Luís | Oct 8, 2003 5:39 am | |
| Murray Stokely | Oct 8, 2003 8:19 am | |
| Murray Stokely | Oct 8, 2003 8:24 am | |
| Oliver Fromme | Oct 8, 2003 8:54 am | |
| Daniel C. Sobral | Oct 8, 2003 10:23 am | |
| Ken Smith | Oct 8, 2003 12:42 pm | |
| Murray Stokely | Oct 8, 2003 8:39 pm | |
| Murray Stokely | Oct 8, 2003 8:43 pm | |
| Murray Stokely | Oct 8, 2003 8:54 pm | |
| Daniel C. Sobral | Oct 9, 2003 5:13 am | |
| João Carlos Mendes Luís | Oct 9, 2003 9:04 am |
| Subject: | 4.9-RC2 is on ftp-master.. | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Oliver Fromme (ol...@lurza.secnetix.de) | |
| Date: | Oct 8, 2003 8:54:52 am | |
| List: | org.freebsd.freebsd-hubs | |
Murray Stokely wrote:
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 12:41:04PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote:
Just a small question: Wouldn't it be a good idea to put each RC under its own subdirectory in ISO-IMAGES, too?
I don't think so, but it has been brought up before..
I don't want people to glance at a '4.9' directory along with 4.8, 4.7, etc.. until we actually have something called 4.9 release. Relying on users to actually look inside the directory and see that we only have RCs and not the final release is I think asking too much.
The subdirectory should be called "4.9-RC2", of course, not just "4.9". And for the actual release, it should be called "4.9-RELEASE". Exactly like the directory names of the FTP install trees.
Currently, there is a significant inconsistency, which needs to be fixed. IMO.
Regards Oliver
-- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co KG, Oettingenstr. 2, 80538 M?nchen Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way.
"It combines all the worst aspects of C and Lisp: a billion different sublanguages in one monolithic executable. It combines the power of C with the readability of PostScript." -- Jamie Zawinski, when asked: "What's wrong with perl?"