atom feed22 messages in at.iem.pd-devRe: [PD-dev] loaderHEX bug report
FromSent OnAttachments
Hans-Christoph SteinerNov 21, 2005 10:16 pm 
IOhannes m zmoelnigNov 22, 2005 1:54 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerNov 22, 2005 7:31 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigNov 22, 2005 7:42 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerNov 22, 2005 8:22 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigNov 22, 2005 8:38 am 
günter geigerNov 22, 2005 9:03 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigNov 22, 2005 9:29 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerNov 22, 2005 10:10 pm 
IOhannes m zmoelnigNov 23, 2005 2:09 am 
Thomas GrillNov 23, 2005 3:31 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigNov 23, 2005 4:22 am 
Thomas GrillNov 23, 2005 4:25 am 
geigerNov 23, 2005 7:38 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigNov 23, 2005 7:46 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerNov 23, 2005 8:41 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerNov 23, 2005 8:50 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerNov 23, 2005 8:51 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigNov 23, 2005 8:53 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerNov 23, 2005 2:34 pm 
geigerNov 24, 2005 2:09 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigNov 30, 2005 9:44 am 
Subject:Re: [PD-dev] loaderHEX bug report
From:IOhannes m zmoelnig (zmoe@iem.at)
Date:Nov 22, 2005 9:29:30 am
List:at.iem.pd-dev

günter geiger wrote:

On Tue, 22 Nov 2005, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:

but probably it would be nice to hear somebody else's opinion on this (at least from those who are not entirely bored of this thread)

Not an opinion,but an alternative proposal would be to use something non-numeric instead of 0x, like "$" for example.

looking into kernighan-ritchie it says (if i read the c-syntax-graph correctly) that the function-name is an identifier which in turn has to match the regular expression "[_A-Za-z]{[_A-Za-z0-9]}*" (transcription to regex done by me, so it might be erroneous)

it doesn't say anything about non-alphanumeric characters (except for the underscore), so i am a bit afraid of that.

mfg.adr IOhannes