10 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.oicRe: [oic] some thoughts on test docum...| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Bart Hanssens | Oct 25, 2008 12:36 pm | |
| robe...@us.ibm.com | Oct 25, 2008 3:17 pm | |
| Bart Hanssens | Oct 25, 2008 4:11 pm | |
| Alan Clark | Oct 27, 2008 11:47 am | |
| Ming Fei Jia | Oct 28, 2008 9:12 am | |
| Bart Hanssens | Oct 28, 2008 12:23 pm | |
| Thorsten Zachmann | Oct 31, 2008 10:28 pm | |
| Thorsten Zachmann | Oct 31, 2008 10:36 pm | |
| Hanssens Bart | Nov 1, 2008 5:15 am | |
| Thorsten Zachmann | Nov 4, 2008 8:08 am |
| Subject: | Re: [oic] some thoughts on test documents | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Bart Hanssens (bart...@skynet.be) | |
| Date: | Oct 28, 2008 12:23:28 pm | |
| List: | org.oasis-open.lists.oic | |
Ming Fei Jia wrote:
Seems difficult to embed comments in the last mail. Based on previous thoughts, put what I am understanding here:
Thanks for your comments, it's a great list !
1.1.3. Select one reference ODF implementation, e.g. OpenOffice.org
Mm, the charter states that we won't be rating or commenting on specific implementations, so selecting OOo as the reference (although it probably is _de facto_) seems a bit like a rating to me...
As far as I'm concerned, one can use any two implementations to check how things are working out...
1.1.8. Build the universal schema validation tool or service. Can we borrow the OpendocumentFellowship ODF validator or OpenOffice.org ODF validator? Or do we plan to build another one?
Mm, building our own solution is out of scope according to the charter...
Now, if I'm not mistaken, those tools are actually wrappers around the RNG schema's, so they can definitely be a starting point to check if our test documents (either hand crafted or tool based) are valid to begin with.
Thomas Zander pointed me out that KOffice does already has automated ODF testing, so that might also be a source of inspiration...
Best regards,
Bart