15 messages in net.sourceforge.lists.courier-usersRe: [courier-users] Planned changes t...
FromSent OnAttachments
Sam VarshavchikSep 20, 2004 6:32 pm 
Jim HornerSep 20, 2004 8:02 pm 
Arturo "Buanzo" BusleimanSep 20, 2004 8:07 pm 
Mitch (WebCob)Sep 20, 2004 11:20 pm 
Scott SharkeySep 21, 2004 6:22 am 
MikeMSep 21, 2004 7:59 am 
Randy SmithSep 21, 2004 9:50 am 
Alexei Batyr'Sep 21, 2004 11:14 am 
Alessandro VeselySep 21, 2004 6:15 pm 
Sam VarshavchikSep 21, 2004 7:07 pm 
Sam VarshavchikSep 22, 2004 3:41 pm 
Michael CarmackSep 22, 2004 6:34 pm 
Johannes ErdfeltSep 22, 2004 8:46 pm 
Stefan HornburgSep 23, 2004 1:20 am 
Alessandro VeselySep 23, 2004 8:11 am 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:Re: [courier-users] Planned changes to Courier's authentication library.Actions...
From:Johannes Erdfelt (joha@erdfelt.com)
Date:Sep 22, 2004 8:46:48 pm
List:net.sourceforge.lists.courier-users

On Mon, Sep 20, 2004, Sam Varshavchik <mrs@courier-mta.com> wrote:

I can only see one possible drawback. Only the daemonized configuration will now be possible. The non-daemonized version of the authentication library will be removed. It is clear that the daemonized configuration is proven to be more flexible, and is the only way to go. The daemonized configuration has been the default configuration for several years.

While I think that spinning off authlib to a seperate library is a good idea, I don't see why a daemonized version is only possible afterwards.

Can you explain why the change to a daemon-only config is necessary?

JE