Messages per Month
| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| John Polstra | Jul 26, 2000 7:35 pm | |
| Chris Costello | Jul 26, 2000 8:54 pm | |
| Nate Williams | Jul 26, 2000 10:54 pm | |
| Mark Murray | Jul 26, 2000 11:15 pm | |
| Warner Losh | Jul 26, 2000 11:24 pm | |
| Adrian Chadd | Jul 27, 2000 12:03 am | |
| Poul-Henning Kamp | Jul 27, 2000 12:30 am | |
| Alfred Perlstein | Jul 27, 2000 12:44 am | |
| Jacques A. Vidrine | Jul 27, 2000 5:50 am | |
| Neil Blakey-Milner | Jul 27, 2000 5:52 am | |
| Jacques A. Vidrine | Jul 27, 2000 6:38 am | |
| Daniel O'Connor | Jul 27, 2000 6:44 am | |
| Neil Blakey-Milner | Jul 27, 2000 6:47 am | |
| Robert Watson | Jul 27, 2000 8:14 am | |
| Alfred Perlstein | Jul 27, 2000 9:39 am | |
| Jacques A. Vidrine | Jul 27, 2000 11:03 am | |
| Ollivier Robert | Jul 27, 2000 12:32 pm | |
| John Polstra | Jul 27, 2000 9:28 pm | |
| John Polstra | Jul 27, 2000 9:38 pm | |
| Alexander Leidinger | Jul 28, 2000 5:09 am | |
| John Polstra | Jul 28, 2000 8:21 am |
| Subject: | Re: How much security should ldconfig enforce? | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Neil Blakey-Milner (nb...@mithrandr.moria.org) | |
| Date: | Jul 27, 2000 5:52:25 am | |
| List: | org.freebsd.freebsd-arch | |
On Thu 2000-07-27 (07:50), Jacques A. Vidrine wrote:
On Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 07:36:13PM -0700, John Polstra wrote:
3. It could default to strictly secure but accept a command-line option to relax the constraints. And an rc.conf knob could be added to control whether or not it was strict at boot time.
I like this option, but the knob should be compile-time, IMHO.
Why?
You expect someone to check out sources and recompile the program to make it secure when you can instead use a command line option?
Neil
-- Neil Blakey-Milner Sunesi Clinical Systems nb...@mithrandr.moria.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majo...@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message





