13 messages in at.iem.pd-listRe: [PD] synchronised video outputs| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| altern | Feb 25, 2008 2:43 am | |
| IOhannes m zmoelnig | Feb 25, 2008 3:12 am | |
| altern | Feb 25, 2008 3:32 am | |
| Damian Stewart | Feb 25, 2008 4:14 am | |
| simon wise | Feb 25, 2008 5:33 am | |
| marius schebella | Feb 25, 2008 7:20 am | |
| B. Bogart | Feb 25, 2008 8:47 am | |
| enrique franco | Feb 25, 2008 11:14 am | |
| altern | Feb 25, 2008 11:38 am | |
| simon wise | Feb 25, 2008 9:04 pm | |
| Jaime Oliver | Feb 25, 2008 9:39 pm | |
| _ Discos Invisibles | Feb 25, 2008 10:25 pm | |
| B. Bogart | Feb 28, 2008 8:54 am |
| Subject: | Re: [PD] synchronised video outputs | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | IOhannes m zmoelnig (zmoe...@iem.at) | |
| Date: | Feb 25, 2008 3:12:30 am | |
| List: | at.iem.pd-list | |
altern wrote:
hi
I need to have several video outputs that run in sync. A friend who works in a art exhibition space told me there would be couple of solutions for this but both involve buying pretty expensive equipment like special DVD players.
I thought then that a solution for this issue could be to have several computers on a local network playing video (with GEM) and synchronise them via OSC. But I dont have any experience doing such a thing, never used OSC for anything similar. Also I dont have a clue about how to synchronise together videos.
Has anyone done anything similar? any experiences to share?
yes. we used a dual-head machine (actually it was a quad-head, so we had plenty of space for editing...) running a single gemwin covering both screens and 2 [pix_film]s that were controlled by the same counter.
since Gem allows you frame-accurate access, the 2 videos were in perfect synch.
fmga.sdr IOhannes