7 messages in com.canoo.lists.webtestRe: [Webtest] Releasing 2.1 to go fur...
FromSent OnAttachments
Marc Guillemot22 Aug 2006 01:19 
Dierk Koenig22 Aug 2006 02:09 
Denis N. Antonioli22 Aug 2006 06:32 
Marc Guillemot23 Aug 2006 02:38 
Sergey Batishchev23 Aug 2006 03:38 
Denis N. Antonioli24 Aug 2006 07:23 
Marc Guillemot24 Aug 2006 07:47 
Subject:Re: [Webtest] Releasing 2.1 to go further?
From:Sergey Batishchev (ba@magenta-technology.ru)
Date:08/23/2006 03:38:40 AM
List:com.canoo.lists.webtest

The only fix I would be very happy to see in 2.1 before major rework is handleUnexpectedException fix to process macro-defs correctly (see discussion on WT-223 a few weeks ago).

If any of the committers have a little bit of bandwith to try this out before release, this would be very much appreciated. Understand that it might not be possible though...

Thanks! Sergey

As it seems to be ok, when could you do it?

Marc.

PS: a branch could be a possibility but would require more time, no cruise control is already available, ...

Denis N. Antonioli wrote:

On 22 août 06, at 10:20, Marc Guillemot wrote:

Hi,

since too many time I talk from what will be possible (with properties, report, memory consumption, ...) once WebTest will correctly use UnknownElement instead of forcing instantiation of the tasks at the beginning of <webtest>. Most of the work is done on my computer since a long time. I compare the report generated with the "current" version to the one generated by the "future" version and the remaining problems are only in the filters steps. As it would already bring advantages and to allow other committers/contributors to help finishing the work, I'd like to commit this work (my laptop isn't a Dell, but I still dislike having these changes only on my harddisk ;-)).

You could make a branch for it ;-)

My proposition would be to release WebTest 2.1 with current state, then I could commit all my changes and we would add extra explanations on the download page to warn about the not fully finished changes until they're fully fixed.

What do you think?

+1

dna