19 messages in com.googlegroups.android-challengeRe: Want to join a winning team?
FromSent OnAttachments
Team needs Android coder27 Mar 2008 13:08 
Incognito27 Mar 2008 13:33 
Muthu Ramadoss27 Mar 2008 21:04 
Alex Pisarev28 Mar 2008 07:22 
Rick Genter28 Mar 2008 07:24 
Alex Pisarev28 Mar 2008 07:58 
Team needs Android coder28 Mar 2008 11:44 
Incognito28 Mar 2008 11:47 
Team needs Android coder28 Mar 2008 11:48 
Chris28 Mar 2008 20:13 
Shane Isbell28 Mar 2008 20:22 
Pathik28 Mar 2008 21:46 
Muthu Ramadoss28 Mar 2008 23:04 
Dan Morrill28 Mar 2008 23:08 
YA29 Mar 2008 09:49 
androidfan229 Mar 2008 14:55 
androidfan229 Mar 2008 15:11 
Team needs Android coder29 Mar 2008 20:00 
Chris30 Mar 2008 11:42 
Subject:Re: Want to join a winning team?
From:Team needs Android coder (jw_h@yahoo.com)
Date:03/28/2008 11:48:26 AM
List:com.googlegroups.android-challenge

Thanks Rick for that clarification. The money we've raised in the past is on other ventures.

This is no scam.... we were a four person team (a designer, a CFO/COO type, a server-side programmer and an android client guy) and we've lost our android guy.

We're forging on regardless of this contest, but I hate to let a good opportunity go.

J

On Mar 28, 9:59 am, Alex Pisarev <alex@gmail.com> wrote:

sorry, my misreading... :(

On Mar 28, 5:25 pm, Rick Genter <rick@comcast.net> wrote:

On Mar 28, 2008, at 7:22 AM, Alex Pisarev wrote:

We have a pretty serious Android project going designed to turn   into a real company with real revenue and real upside for its founders. Between the founders we have raised more than $100 M in venture capital for early stage start-ups.  There is no doubt we can do it again with the right product.

Definetely a scam. 100M for early start-up? I would like to see the VCs who are naive enough to waste such money for early startups.

Also, it's quite interesting that the success of such powerful enterprise is so much related on one Java coder :)

Though I have no opinion on the original poster, several people are   misreading what was originally typed. The OP said that they "have   raised more than $100 M in venture capital for early stage start-ups".   That doesn't mean that *this* venture has $100 M behind it, only that   they've done that in the past.