atom feed13 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-qaRe: followup to problems with 4.3-RC1...
FromSent OnAttachments
John ReynoldsMar 28, 2001 5:50 pm 
John BaldwinMar 29, 2001 11:50 am 
Mike SmithMar 29, 2001 2:30 pm 
Warner LoshMar 29, 2001 11:52 pm 
Warner LoshMar 29, 2001 11:55 pm 
John BaldwinMar 30, 2001 3:00 pm 
Warner LoshMar 30, 2001 8:49 pm 
Alfred PerlsteinApr 2, 2001 10:43 am 
John BaldwinApr 2, 2001 11:36 am 
Alfred PerlsteinApr 2, 2001 12:20 pm 
John BaldwinApr 2, 2001 12:33 pm 
John BaldwinApr 2, 2001 4:16 pm 
Alfred PerlsteinApr 2, 2001 11:33 pm 
Subject:Re: followup to problems with 4.3-RC1 for laptops
From:John Baldwin (jh@FreeBSD.org)
Date:Apr 2, 2001 4:16:28 pm
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-qa

On 02-Apr-01 Alfred Perlstein wrote:

* John Baldwin <jh@FreeBSD.org> [010402 11:34] wrote:

On 02-Apr-01 Alfred Perlstein wrote:

Shouldn't the device be able to specify an all-or-nothing request?

Perhaps something that needs fast interrupts will cause much hair pulling if it doesn't get one becasue of latency issues messing up the hardware. If the bus didn't grant a fast interrupt it could then declien to attach, perhaps spitting out a meaningful error message at the same time.

True, no need for an error message, but I suppose one could do something like this then:

Of course there's no need for an error message, everyone installing FreeBSD should be able to look at the kernel sources for his driver and figure out what's wrong with it.

If you get an error in attach(), you will return it back up the chain and device_probe_and_attach() will output a message such as:

foo0: attach failed - returned 6

or some such.

*gulps down another 2 sarcasm pills*

*thwap*

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-qa" in the body of the message