5 messages in org.apache.logging.log4j-userRE: Problem with filtering TIMESTAMP ...
FromSent OnAttachments
Kena...@vectorsgi.comJun 18, 2004 12:56 pm 
Scott DeboyJun 18, 2004 1:24 pm 
Scott DeboyJun 20, 2004 12:40 am 
Mike Blake-KnoxJun 21, 2004 12:51 pm 
Scott DeboyJun 21, 2004 2:10 pm 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:RE: Problem with filtering TIMESTAMP in ChainsawActions...
From:Scott Deboy (sde@comotivsystems.com)
Date:Jun 20, 2004 12:40:49 am
List:org.apache.logging.log4j-user

I've made a change that should address some of your issues relating to the
ability to filter on the TIMESTAMP field.

Equality and inequality rules now support the timestamp field, using a specific
date format pattern: 'yyyy/MM/dd HH:mm:ss' (include the ticks when building
expressions because of the space in the pattern).

For example, to see all events for the 18th of June, use this expression: TIMESTAMP >= '2004/06/18 00:00:00' && TIMESTAMP <= '2004/06/19 00:00:00'

The equality and inequality operators support the Timestamp field using this
pattern, but neither ~= (partial text match) nor LIKE (regexp) operators provide
this support.

This capability is available from the head of the logging-log4j CVS module. The
web start client hasn't been updated, but should be soon.

Scott

-----Original Message----- From: Kena@vectorsgi.com [mailto:Kena@vectorsgi.com] Sent: Fri 6/18/2004 12:56 PM To: log4@jakarta.apache.org Cc: Subject: Problem with filtering TIMESTAMP in Chainsaw Hi,

I just started using Chainsaw and it looks really cool.

However, I could not filter TIMESTAMP field. For example, when I right-click on TIMESTAMP field and select: Set "Refine Focus' Field, it returns nothing. Same thing happens if I use regular expression. Here is example of my timestamp value: 2004-06-18 14:36:13,270.

Here is regular expression I'm using: TIMESTAMP LIKE .*2004-06-18.*.

Actually, I noticed that TIMESTAMP filter only works with millisecond part of the timestamp (in my case: 270).

Is this possible, or am I missing something here?

Thanks for any help,

Kenan

VECTORsgi - leading provider of check image exchange software. VECTORsgi's Consulting Services - image exchange strategy development and deployment. Image Exchange - VECTORsgi Gets You There!

Learn about VECTORsgi by using http://www.VECTORsgi.com