atom feed13 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-questionsRe: Is it worthy upgrading to 9.0 ?
FromSent OnAttachments
sw2wolfFeb 27, 2012 4:52 pm 
Damien FleuriotFeb 28, 2012 12:03 am 
Erich DollanskyFeb 28, 2012 2:21 am 
Stas VerberktFeb 28, 2012 5:14 am 
Damien FleuriotFeb 28, 2012 5:51 am 
Matthew SeamanFeb 28, 2012 6:02 am 
RWFeb 28, 2012 7:20 am 
Patrick LamaiziereFeb 28, 2012 11:45 am 
Waitman GobbleFeb 28, 2012 12:07 pm 
AllenMar 5, 2012 10:01 pm 
Damien FleuriotMar 6, 2012 1:49 am 
kradMar 6, 2012 3:29 am 
Damien FleuriotMar 7, 2012 6:11 am 
Subject:Re: Is it worthy upgrading to 9.0 ?
From:Erich Dollansky (eric@ovitrap.com)
Date:Feb 28, 2012 2:21:12 am
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-questions

Hi,

I cannot tell how often I have said this already. I stay with the even branches
until the next even branch comes out. Currently, the machine here runs 8.3 and
will stick to 8 until 10.0 or 10.1 will arrive at the scene.

But for technical reasons, I have left one machine on 7 after the upgrade from 6
to 8 failed. It is a very old machine and some hardware support got dropped.

Erich

On Tuesday 28 February 2012 15:03:45 Damien Fleuriot wrote:

On 2/28/12 1:52 AM, sw2wolf wrote:

uname -a

FreeBSD mybsd.zsoft.com 8.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE #3: Fri Sep 30 15:23:56 CST 2011 ro@mybsd.zsoft.com:/media/G/usr/obj/media/G/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL i386

I am using 8.2 for a long time. And it works VERY well.

Any suggestion is appreciated!

This is an entirely subjective question and one that only you can answer.

For example, given the number of problem reports I'm seeing on the lists, I'm going to stick with the 8-STABLE branch for still a long time, likely until 9.1 or 9.2-RELEASE.

You may want to reflect on the features you currently use and whether they've been improved in 9.0-RELEASE or not (eg ZFS v28)