9 messages in com.xensource.lists.xen-develRe: [Xen-devel] Crash
FromSent OnAttachments
visik724 Feb 2005 14:45 
visik724 Feb 2005 16:24 
Keir Fraser24 Feb 2005 23:10 
visik724 Feb 2005 23:59 
Keir Fraser25 Feb 2005 06:59 
visik727 Feb 2005 15:46 
visik701 Mar 2005 15:06 
Keir Fraser01 Mar 2005 23:31 
visik702 Mar 2005 03:52 
Subject:Re: [Xen-devel] Crash
From:visik7 (visi@libero.it)
Date:02/27/2005 03:46:06 PM
List:com.xensource.lists.xen-devel

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1

Keir Fraser wrote:

| After writing my previosu email I've concluded that, even if we fix | cli/sti instructions, there are other arch-dependencies that are | much harder for us to handle automatically, or even with static | rewriting of the driver binary. | | Really, since you are building this driver from source, the correct | course of action is to find why it compiled against i386 rather | than xen architecture. It is probably something really simple: | e.g., did you build the driver while in native Linuxt and only | after hat reboot into XenLinux? If you know how, taking a look at | the compiler command line and Makefiles will probably make it | fairly obvious how to make the driver look at arch/xen rather than | arch/i386. | | -- Keir | | ok I do the following steps: compile a kernel linux-2.6.10-xen0 and use it both for dom0 and domU than after run a domU I get the source of linux-2.6.10-xen0 tree into /usr/src/linux-2.6.10 (getting also linux-2.6.10-xen-sparse and putting it in the same dir of the source (so no broken links)) after doing this I compiled my driver against this source I check the source tree of the module but there aren't no explicit reference to i386 thankyou ~ Marco -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCIlvTihYL426P5W4RAkErAJ9+h9J1ZF0N3aSeFq+S1437IvKLHQCfSvAD +al2WPxpY2sr0wqXjMfE8HI= =HNSj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----