atom feed18 messages in at.iem.pd-dev[PD-dev] is namecanvas obsolete or not?
FromSent OnAttachments
Tim BlechmannDec 29, 2004 1:41 pm.pd, .pd, .pd
Krzysztof CzajaDec 30, 2004 3:57 am 
Frank BarknechtDec 30, 2004 7:07 am 
Tim BlechmannDec 30, 2004 7:53 am 
Miller PucketteDec 30, 2004 11:02 am 
Frank BarknechtDec 30, 2004 11:14 am 
Frank BarknechtDec 30, 2004 11:35 am 
Tim BlechmannDec 30, 2004 12:43 pm 
Tim BlechmannDec 30, 2004 1:02 pm 
ixDec 30, 2004 2:26 pm 
Mathieu BouchardDec 31, 2004 10:50 am 
Mathieu BouchardDec 31, 2004 11:37 am 
Tim BlechmannJan 2, 2005 3:37 am 
Thomas GrillJan 2, 2005 4:02 am 
Tim BlechmannJan 2, 2005 5:14 am.pd
Krzysztof CzajaJan 3, 2005 6:28 am 
Krzysztof CzajaJan 3, 2005 6:33 am 
Frank BarknechtJan 3, 2005 6:45 am 
Subject:[PD-dev] is namecanvas obsolete or not?
From:Tim Blechmann (TimB@gmx.net)
Date:Dec 29, 2004 1:41:43 pm
List:at.iem.pd-dev
Attachments:
main-test.pd - 0.1k
test.pd - 0.2k
test2.pd - 0.3k

hi miller, hi devs ...

i wrote an abstraction using message-based patching ...

therefor, i was sending the messages to pd-test.pd ... but since it's an abstraction all other instances of test will receive the same message, resulting in the multiple creation of the object ...

to solve this, i had to use namecanvas $0-test... and send the messages there ... (example patch is attatched)

am i missing something obvious or is namecanvas not as obsolete as the helpfile says...

cheers ... tim

-- mailto:TimB@gmx.de ICQ: 96771783 http://www.mokabar.tk

After one look at this planet any visitor from outer space would say "I want to see the manager." William S. Burroughs