atom feed42 messages in net.sourceforge.lists.nagios-develRe: [Nagios-devel] The nagios communi...
FromSent OnAttachments
Olivier JANFeb 23, 2010 1:35 am 
Olivier JANFeb 23, 2010 1:47 am 
Christian DöblerFeb 23, 2010 2:56 am 
Michael FriedrichFeb 23, 2010 4:57 am 
napFeb 23, 2010 5:52 am 
napFeb 25, 2010 2:05 am 
Andreas EricssonFeb 25, 2010 5:23 am 
Marc PowellFeb 25, 2010 5:55 am 
napFeb 25, 2010 6:08 am 
Michael FriedrichFeb 25, 2010 6:23 am 
Martin MelinFeb 25, 2010 6:27 am 
napFeb 25, 2010 6:43 am 
Marc PowellFeb 25, 2010 7:53 am 
Frost, Mark {PBG}Feb 25, 2010 8:17 am 
Andreas EricssonFeb 25, 2010 8:25 am 
Andreas EricssonFeb 25, 2010 9:07 am 
L BFeb 25, 2010 2:08 pm 
Ciro IriarteFeb 26, 2010 5:24 am 
anthony paradisFeb 26, 2010 7:00 am 
sebFeb 26, 2010 7:06 am 
Romuald FRONTEAUFeb 26, 2010 7:34 am 
Andreas EricssonFeb 26, 2010 7:37 am 
napFeb 26, 2010 11:52 am 
Gerhard LausserFeb 26, 2010 12:29 pm 
anthony paradisFeb 26, 2010 12:56 pm 
Michael FriedrichFeb 26, 2010 1:01 pm 
Gius, MarkFeb 26, 2010 2:38 pm 
L BFeb 27, 2010 8:30 am 
Michael FriedrichFeb 27, 2010 9:30 am 
LappiesFeb 27, 2010 9:45 am 
Sasc...@gfkl.comMar 1, 2010 7:19 am 
Andreas EricssonMar 1, 2010 7:58 am 
Andreas EricssonMar 1, 2010 8:05 am 
Andreas EricssonMar 1, 2010 8:32 am 
Michael FriedrichMar 1, 2010 9:08 am 
Ethan GalstadMar 1, 2010 9:00 pm 
Ethan GalstadMar 1, 2010 9:11 pm 
Andreas EricssonMar 1, 2010 11:15 pm 
Andreas EricssonMar 2, 2010 6:10 am 
Ethan GalstadMar 2, 2010 9:29 am 
Romuald FRONTEAUMar 2, 2010 9:50 am 
Gerhard LausserMar 2, 2010 10:25 am 
Subject:Re: [Nagios-devel] The nagios community wants to keep its open soul
From:nap (napa@gmail.com)
Date:Feb 25, 2010 6:43:43 am
List:net.sourceforge.lists.nagios-devel

On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Michael Friedrich < mich@univie.ac.at> wrote:

nap wrote:

Maybe we can add a bug ticket so ideas.nagios.org <http://ideas.nagios.org> ask real names?

Problem is that the voting system allows anonymous votes, generating a random user "login" for each vote. session based cookies, hidden by an ajax based vote - some people might be able to exploit that. But it does not really explain the returning series of up/down votes - that's for the sysadmin at nagios enterprises.

Yes and that is a answer about presentation (and everyone can choose to do not look at it, it seems that some peoples already choose it), but we still wait an answer about the content of the open letter.

Maybe that was the only anwser we will have? But I still hope we will have a true one in some times, and not about names in a vote system.

Or maybe we can really think

people ask a road map for this project and answers? You can also read some of the post around the web like http://linuxfr.org/~naparuba/29408.html<http://linuxfr.org/%7Enaparuba/29408.html>(sorry
this one is in french) that speak about it and see what real people (with not a random name if you prefer) thinks about the need of answer about where the project is going.

Hm, would be nice if you could translate a bit. Others might not understand a bit of French as I do.

There a quite too much for my poor english capabilities but the major part of theses posts is resumed by "he can be irritated about icinga for the treademark conflict, but in an open source community we can speak about what we want".

Jean

Kind regards, Michael

Jean

Ps: if every 4 votes is a downvote, it mean that even more than 400 people vote for it, isn't it?

On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Marc Powell <ma@ena.com <mailto:ma@ena.com>> wrote:

On Feb 25, 2010, at 7:24 AM, Andreas Ericsson wrote:

> BBD0ZQ4q > BBD0ZQ4p > BBD0ZQ4o > BBD0ZQ4n > BBD0ZQ4m > BBD0ZQ4k > BBD0ZQ4j > BBD0ZQ4i > BBD0ZQ4h > BBD0ZQ4f

And still going, with every 4th vote being a downvote...

BBD0ZQ45 BBD0ZQ44 BBD0ZQ43 BBD0ZQ42 BBD0ZQ41 BBD0ZQ40 BBD0ZQ4z BBD0ZQ4x BBD0ZQ4w BBD0ZQ4v

-- Marc

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Nagios-devel mailing list Nagi@lists.sourceforge.net <mailto:Nagi@lists.sourceforge.net> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-devel

------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev

-- DI (FH) Michael Friedrich mich@univie.ac.at Tel: +43 1 4277 14359

Vienna University Computer Center Universitaetsstrasse 7 A-1010 Vienna, Austria

------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev

------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev