atom feed120 messages in org.apache.tomcat.usersRE: I don´t understand the objective ...
FromSent OnAttachments
50 earlier messages
Mike DiChiappariDec 9, 2002 4:36 pm 
MarkDec 9, 2002 5:02 pm 
Peng Tuck KwokDec 9, 2002 5:02 pm 
Noel J. BergmanDec 9, 2002 5:22 pm 
Mike DiChiappariDec 9, 2002 5:30 pm 
Mike DiChiappariDec 9, 2002 5:36 pm 
Noel J. BergmanDec 9, 2002 5:53 pm 
Mark EggersDec 9, 2002 5:55 pm 
Peng Tuck KwokDec 9, 2002 6:24 pm 
Mike DiChiappariDec 9, 2002 6:42 pm 
David BoyerDec 9, 2002 6:51 pm 
Noel J. BergmanDec 9, 2002 7:14 pm 
Noel J. BergmanDec 9, 2002 7:18 pm 
Mark EggersDec 9, 2002 7:23 pm 
Noel J. BergmanDec 9, 2002 8:00 pm 
micaelDec 9, 2002 9:35 pm 
micaelDec 9, 2002 9:40 pm 
Tref GareDec 9, 2002 11:41 pm 
Simon KellyDec 10, 2002 12:39 am 
Turner, JohnDec 10, 2002 5:20 am 
Turner, JohnDec 10, 2002 5:21 am 
Turner, JohnDec 10, 2002 5:32 am 
Hamilton, AndrewDec 10, 2002 5:45 am 
Turner, JohnDec 10, 2002 5:56 am 
Jim UrbanDec 10, 2002 5:57 am 
Michael NicholsonDec 10, 2002 5:58 am 
Felipe SchnackDec 10, 2002 5:59 am 
Jim UrbanDec 10, 2002 6:03 am 
Turner, JohnDec 10, 2002 6:05 am 
Reynir HübnerDec 10, 2002 6:06 am 
Turner, JohnDec 10, 2002 6:11 am 
Jim HendersonDec 10, 2002 6:15 am 
V. CekvenichDec 10, 2002 6:17 am 
Dave SillDec 10, 2002 6:36 am 
Turner, JohnDec 10, 2002 6:43 am 
V. CekvenichDec 10, 2002 6:52 am 
Dave SillDec 10, 2002 7:07 am 
Turner, JohnDec 10, 2002 7:11 am 
Dave SillDec 10, 2002 7:17 am 
ContestAdminDec 10, 2002 7:22 am 
Carlos Alberto Pelaez AyalaDec 10, 2002 8:19 am 
Price, ErikDec 10, 2002 8:29 am 
Ben RickerDec 10, 2002 8:29 am 
Turner, JohnDec 10, 2002 8:29 am 
grenomlDec 10, 2002 8:36 am 
Anup RayDec 10, 2002 8:58 am 
Turner, JohnDec 10, 2002 9:13 am 
Anup RayDec 10, 2002 12:21 pm 
Turner, JohnDec 10, 2002 12:26 pm 
Craig R. McClanahanDec 10, 2002 5:33 pm 
Matthew O'HaireDec 10, 2002 7:18 pm 
Bill BarkerDec 10, 2002 10:45 pm 
Carlos Alberto Peláez AyalaDec 11, 2002 7:01 am 
Anup RayDec 11, 2002 9:32 am 
nealDec 11, 2002 2:48 pm 
Joe TomcatDec 11, 2002 3:50 pm 
Noel J. BergmanDec 11, 2002 4:24 pm 
Madere, ColinDec 11, 2002 4:46 pm 
Noel J. BergmanDec 11, 2002 5:15 pm 
Craig R. McClanahanDec 11, 2002 7:10 pm 
nealDec 11, 2002 7:19 pm 
Noel J. BergmanDec 11, 2002 7:37 pm 
Noel J. BergmanDec 11, 2002 7:57 pm 
nealDec 11, 2002 8:01 pm 
Noel J. BergmanDec 11, 2002 8:07 pm 
Noel J. BergmanDec 11, 2002 8:38 pm 
nealDec 11, 2002 9:28 pm 
Ralph EinfeldtDec 11, 2002 11:25 pm 
Bill BarkerDec 11, 2002 11:33 pm 
Craig R. McClanahanDec 12, 2002 7:10 pm 
Subject:RE: I don´t understand the objective of this open list !
From:Craig R. McClanahan (crai@apache.org)
Date:Dec 10, 2002 5:33:33 pm
List:org.apache.tomcat.users

On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Turner, John wrote:

You're forgetting that Tomcat is a reference implementation.

This is not actually true in the legal sense, or really any longer relevant in the practical sense.

In the legal sense, Tomcat code is *used in* the reference implementation for J2EE, which has been the official RI to date for the servlet and JSP specs. Tomcat by itself is not, and never has been, the "official" RI. It is now possible, though (thanks to the JCP modifications championed by Apache, and announced at JavaOne 2002), to certify that Tomcat officially conforms to the specs -- but it is till not, on its own, the RI.

In a practical sense, way to many people have invested way too much time in adding high qualify features and performance improvements to Tomcat to think of it as "just" a reference implementation. Tomcat generally gets in the neighborhood of 80k downloads per month, just off of Apache's main web site. I suspect that more than a few of those downloads end up on production servers for mission critical applications :-).

Nobody is positioning it as a be-all, end-all commercial solution.

By the way, there is no such thing as a "be-all, end-all" solution to any complex problem, commercial or otherwise :-).

Craig