11 messages in com.googlegroups.sqlalchemy[sqlalchemy] Re: SA 0.3.4 released| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Michael Bayer | 23 Jan 2007 11:57 | |
| Michael Bayer | 23 Jan 2007 12:14 | |
| JP | 24 Jan 2007 08:25 | |
| Michael Bayer | 24 Jan 2007 08:41 | |
| JP | 24 Jan 2007 09:12 | |
| Michael Bayer | 24 Jan 2007 09:43 | |
| JP | 24 Jan 2007 11:08 | |
| JP | 24 Jan 2007 11:19 | |
| Michael Bayer | 24 Jan 2007 12:42 | |
| Michael Bayer | 24 Jan 2007 13:45 | |
| JP | 24 Jan 2007 13:59 |
| Subject: | [sqlalchemy] Re: SA 0.3.4 released![]() |
|---|---|
| From: | Michael Bayer (mike...@zzzcomputing.com) |
| Date: | 01/24/2007 01:45:14 PM |
| List: | com.googlegroups.sqlalchemy |
hey jason -
someone reported an error regarding many-to-one relationships to certain polymorphic joins, which was definitely introduced in 0.3.4. ive fixed that issue in rev 2250. if your inheritance conditions use polymorphic unions, you might want to try it out and see if it resolves your other problem.
- mike
On Jan 24, 2007, at 2:19 PM, JP wrote:
(repeating my last ticket comment)
Ok, I think I've tracked this down. The error is occurring because the name of the backref is 'options', which as of r2205 is being overwritten by assign_mapper.
I'm not sure what's the right thing to do here. I don't think assign_mapper can avoid stepping on backrefs like this one, since (I think) the backref doesn't exist when assign_mapper is monkeypatching the domain model class.
JP
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sqlalchemy" group.
To post to this group, send email to sqla...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sqla...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---




