-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
Kevin Burton wrote:
If cluster was solid and feature par with MyISAM there's nothing
preventing existing customers from upgrading.
Thoughts?
I have got one word for you: performance.
One of the strengths of MySQL is that pluggable storage engines allow
you to focus on your application's needs.
Why waste precious CPU cycles in cluster concurrency code when you have
only one node?
A MyISAM table will IMO always give you faster SELECTs than a single
node cluster. That's simply because there's so much work to do to make a
cluster reliable.
Besides: I don't see what one woulld gain by giving up the other engines.
Regards,
Phil
- --
All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that
the parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore,
if you can't get them together again, there must be a reason.
By all means, do not use a hammer.
-- IBM maintenance manual, 1925
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQCVAwUBRXVXRuSILlca4lrrAQJ2twP/Scvw32j0Gcq3h2bdlCuuIloIJAgfn6gK
iPftL1vpQxSmMtmdnpt6zVSkjvUP2WDTyrtY+Q/Se6qjytA1tQz4GgAEVsimEm3d
/qfSSTeOU7rp8Bxf2s/Q7zJfmWnoxfrz354iKTQrlmFiw6siiR3fAXSomhDkhwPH
GVkYLz5I6B0=
=1YWI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
4 messages in com.mysql.lists.clusterRe: MySQL should focus 100% on NDB (f...