atom feed76 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-stableRe: after the release ...
FromSent OnAttachments
Drew Derbyshire - UUPC/extended software supportMar 19, 1998 3:57 pm 
Daniel O'CallaghanMar 19, 1998 4:15 pm 
Eivind EklundMar 20, 1998 1:49 am 
Eivind EklundMar 20, 1998 1:52 am 
Drew Derbyshire - UUPC/extended software supportMar 20, 1998 5:51 am 
ni...@iii.co.ukMar 20, 1998 6:17 am 
Eivind EklundMar 20, 1998 7:47 am 
Mike SmithMar 20, 1998 8:02 am 
Jordan K. HubbardMar 20, 1998 8:22 am 
Mike SmithMar 20, 1998 8:51 am 
Brian BeattieMar 20, 1998 8:54 am 
Ted SpradleyMar 20, 1998 9:23 am 
Wes Peters - Softweyr LLCMar 20, 1998 9:40 am 
A. Karl HellerMar 20, 1998 10:04 am 
Matthew D. FullerMar 20, 1998 10:31 am 
Greg ShenautMar 20, 1998 11:00 am 
Brian BeattieMar 20, 1998 12:45 pm 
Ted SpradleyMar 20, 1998 1:08 pm 
Derek FlowersMar 20, 1998 1:10 pm 
Matthew D. FullerMar 20, 1998 1:18 pm 
melanie bMar 20, 1998 1:55 pm 
Jonathan M. BreslerMar 20, 1998 2:27 pm 
Daniel O'CallaghanMar 20, 1998 2:30 pm 
Daniel O'CallaghanMar 20, 1998 2:41 pm 
Daniel O'CallaghanMar 20, 1998 2:47 pm 
Ted SpradleyMar 20, 1998 3:02 pm 
Jordan K. HubbardMar 20, 1998 3:12 pm 
Jonathan M. BreslerMar 20, 1998 3:13 pm 
Eivind EklundMar 20, 1998 3:17 pm 
Chris FaehlMar 20, 1998 3:47 pm 
Jordan K. HubbardMar 20, 1998 3:59 pm 
Chad R. LarsonMar 20, 1998 4:38 pm 
Robert WatsonMar 20, 1998 5:36 pm 
Wes Peters - Softweyr LLCMar 20, 1998 5:44 pm 
Wes Peters - Softweyr LLCMar 20, 1998 5:52 pm 
Wes Peters - Softweyr LLCMar 20, 1998 5:58 pm 
Derek FlowersMar 20, 1998 6:22 pm 
Robert WatsonMar 20, 1998 6:33 pm 
Eivind EklundMar 20, 1998 6:50 pm 
Evan ChampionMar 20, 1998 7:02 pm 
Drew Derbyshire - UUPC/extended software supportMar 20, 1998 10:25 pm 
Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems GroupMar 20, 1998 11:48 pm 
Nate WilliamsMar 21, 1998 3:44 am 
Nate WilliamsMar 21, 1998 3:45 am 
Eivind EklundMar 21, 1998 6:47 am 
Derek FlowersMar 21, 1998 10:28 am 
allen campbellMar 21, 1998 12:39 pm 
Travis MikalsonMar 21, 1998 12:56 pm 
Matt BehrensMar 21, 1998 2:34 pm 
Jonathan M. BreslerMar 21, 1998 5:16 pm 
Drew Derbyshire - UUPC/extended software supportMar 21, 1998 8:33 pm 
Derek FlowersMar 22, 1998 12:38 am 
Jordan K. HubbardMar 22, 1998 7:38 am 
Robert WatsonMar 22, 1998 9:24 am 
Derek FlowersMar 22, 1998 10:12 am 
Derek FlowersMar 22, 1998 12:23 pm 
Jordan K. HubbardMar 22, 1998 2:45 pm 
Derek FlowersMar 22, 1998 4:16 pm 
Daniel O'ConnorMar 22, 1998 4:30 pm 
Daniel O'ConnorMar 22, 1998 5:00 pm 
Daniel O'CallaghanMar 22, 1998 10:34 pm 
Greg ShenautMar 22, 1998 10:56 pm 
Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems GroupMar 23, 1998 7:00 am 
Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems GroupMar 23, 1998 7:17 am 
Wes Peters - Softweyr LLCMar 23, 1998 9:20 am 
David WolfskillMar 23, 1998 9:51 am 
Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems GroupMar 23, 1998 11:41 am 
Derek FlowersMar 23, 1998 12:46 pm 
Derek FlowersMar 23, 1998 12:51 pm 
Wes Peters - Softweyr LLCMar 23, 1998 2:09 pm 
Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems GroupMar 23, 1998 2:35 pm 
Eivind EklundMar 23, 1998 2:36 pm 
Daniel O'ConnorMar 23, 1998 8:43 pm 
Derek FlowersMar 23, 1998 9:08 pm 
Eivind EklundMar 24, 1998 7:58 am 
Wes PetersMar 24, 1998 9:55 pm 
Subject:Re: after the release ...
From:Ted Spradley (tsp@set.spradley.tmi.net)
Date:Mar 20, 1998 9:23:32 am
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-stable

I neither a CVS expert nor directing FreeBSD release policy. I'm only pointing out a failure in the FreeBSD release cycle, as Jordan pointed out HP and Sun have bugs, but THEY have a packaged patch process. FreeBSD does not, it only has "upgrade to the next release" or hand patch any fixes into the source and rebuild.

I take exception to the word 'hand' here. You really ought to try to learn a bit about make and cvs. IMHO, those are two of the most useful things a computer can do (but they're not graphical, not even interactive, so they're completely out of fashion (don't *start*, Ted)). And they're not just for programmers.

Adding such a patch function seems to be an issue of packaging a limited number of critical changes (in 2.2.5 for example, it would have been the lpd and the security fixes) into a package. Under System V, it would be pkgadd. Under FreeBSD the best method seems to be ports.

I presume you mean a *binary* patch here. What's the big advantage of binary
over source? You don't have to pay extra for the compiler. I suppose the
binary patch would run faster, but the computer does the work, not you, so why
do you care? The source patch is more likely to get it right, and if it
doesn't, you've got a tiny chance to fix it.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message