26 messages in org.apache.myfaces.devRe: [VOTE] jul instead of commons-log...| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Gerhard Petracek | Jun 9, 2009 11:32 am | |
| Matthias Wessendorf | Jun 9, 2009 11:41 am | |
| Michael Concini | Jun 9, 2009 11:55 am | |
| Curtiss Howard | Jun 9, 2009 11:56 am | |
| Mike Kienenberger | Jun 9, 2009 12:01 pm | |
| Mario Ivankovits | Jun 9, 2009 12:34 pm | |
| Cagatay Civici | Jun 9, 2009 12:40 pm | |
| Hazem Saleh | Jun 9, 2009 1:03 pm | |
| Manfred Geiler | Jun 9, 2009 3:24 pm | |
| Werner Punz | Jun 9, 2009 10:13 pm | |
| Grant Smith | Jun 10, 2009 8:16 am | |
| Grant Smith | Jun 10, 2009 8:17 am | |
| Matthias Wessendorf | Jun 10, 2009 8:53 am | |
| Matthias Wessendorf | Jun 10, 2009 9:28 am | |
| Volker Weber | Jun 10, 2009 10:24 am | |
| Werner Punz | Jun 10, 2009 10:38 am | |
| Andrew Robinson | Jun 10, 2009 11:31 am | |
| Werner Punz | Jun 11, 2009 1:33 pm | |
| Bernd Bohmann | Jun 12, 2009 2:16 am | |
| Ganesh | Jun 14, 2009 2:24 am | |
| Matthias Wessendorf | Jun 14, 2009 10:50 am | |
| Bernd Bohmann | Jun 14, 2009 1:30 pm | |
| Werner Punz | Jun 15, 2009 1:34 am | |
| Gerhard Petracek | Jul 8, 2009 2:54 am | |
| Hazem Saleh | Jul 8, 2009 6:31 am | |
| Jan-Kees van Andel | Jul 8, 2009 6:38 am |
| Subject: | Re: [VOTE] jul instead of commons-logging | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Gerhard Petracek (gerh...@gmail.com) | |
| Date: | Jul 8, 2009 2:54:35 am | |
| List: | org.apache.myfaces.dev | |
Maybe we should stop the voting process
+1 (due to several reasons)
new suggestion: if a sub-project would like to switch to jul, we don't need a vote (since there is no new dependency). if a sub-project would like to switch e.g. to slf4j, we have to vote (due to the new logging-framework dependency).
regards, gerhard
Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
2009/6/15 Werner Punz <wern...@gmail.com>
Bernd Bohmann schrieb:
Hi,
i think many users are still using log4j in their projects. Switching to jul instead of slf4j would cause more consequences for the user. But maybe I'm wrong.
Regards
Bernd
Maybe we should stop the voting process for now until we have done
further research on the implications.
My personal preferrence would be simply to get rid of another pesky dependency instead of just switching dependencies hence I voted +1 for JUL!