atom feed3 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.wsbpelRE: [wsbpel] Issue - 99 - Updated Pro...
FromSent OnAttachments
Trickovic, IvanaOct 24, 2005 9:28 am 
Mehta, Vinkesh (US - Austin)Oct 24, 2005 12:50 pm 
Trickovic, IvanaOct 25, 2005 4:54 am 
Subject:RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 99 - Updated Proposal For Vote
From:Mehta, Vinkesh (US - Austin) (vme@DELOITTE.com)
Date:Oct 24, 2005 12:50:31 pm
List:org.oasis-open.lists.wsbpel

Ivana,

Small correction: I believe you mean "(per 15.1, [5])" and not "(per 15.1.1, [5])

Regards, -Vinky

-----Original Message----- From: Trickovic, Ivana [mailto:ivan@sap.com] Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 11:29 AM To: wsb@lists.oasis-open.org Cc: rkha@watson.ibm.com Subject: [wsbpel] Issue - 99 - Updated Proposal For Vote

Below please find wording that needs to be incorporated into the resolution for issue 82.

Rania, thanks for your suggestions and comments.

Regards,

Ivana

Proposal: ==========

Changes to "15.1 The Common Base":

----------------------------------- Add the following sentence as bullet #5: [5] An Abstract process MAY omit the 'createInstance' activity (receive/pick) that is mandatory for executable BPEL processes.

Changes to section 15.1.1:

-------------------------- Add sentence "Note that it is allowed to omit the 'createInstance' activity in an abstract process as well (per 15.1.1, [5])." after sentence "To enforce this, we restrict the omittable tokens to all...".

Changes to section 15.1.2:

--------------------------- Change the definition of basic exec completion to say:

A basic executable completion of an abstract process is an executable completion whose allowed syntactic transformations are limited to (a) below, plus the addition of an activity with "createInstance='yes'" if none are present in the Abstract Process (per 15.1.1, [5])."

<end>

This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message.