atom feed46 messages in edu.merit.nanogRe: US DOJ victim letter
FromSent OnAttachments
Jay HenniganJan 19, 2012 12:59 pm 
Michael HareJan 19, 2012 1:01 pm 
Tim JacksonJan 19, 2012 1:02 pm 
Dave EllisJan 19, 2012 1:03 pm 
Jay HenniganJan 19, 2012 1:04 pm 
Michael J McCaffertyJan 19, 2012 1:04 pm 
MLJan 19, 2012 1:05 pm 
Randy CarpenterJan 19, 2012 1:05 pm 
Alan CleggJan 19, 2012 1:08 pm 
Andrew D. DibbleJan 19, 2012 1:15 pm 
Chris AdamsJan 19, 2012 1:16 pm 
Chris AdamsJan 19, 2012 1:18 pm 
Lane PowersJan 19, 2012 1:27 pm 
PCJan 19, 2012 1:33 pm 
Carlos AlcantarJan 19, 2012 1:34 pm 
Simon LockhartJan 19, 2012 1:35 pm 
Todd LyonsJan 19, 2012 1:37 pm 
Ryan GelobterJan 19, 2012 2:36 pm 
-Hammer-Jan 20, 2012 6:06 am 
Mike AndrewsJan 20, 2012 6:55 am 
Robert BonomiJan 20, 2012 11:05 am 
Carlos AlcantarJan 27, 2012 10:11 am 
Bryan Horstmann-AllenJan 27, 2012 10:16 am 
Randy EpsteinJan 27, 2012 10:20 am 
MikeJan 27, 2012 10:21 am 
Vald...@vt.eduJan 27, 2012 10:22 am 
Randy EpsteinJan 27, 2012 10:31 am 
Carlos AlcantarJan 27, 2012 10:45 am 
Sean DonelanJan 27, 2012 10:52 am 
Jon LewisJan 27, 2012 12:22 pm 
Harry HoffmanJan 27, 2012 12:29 pm 
Martin HanniganJan 27, 2012 7:19 pm 
bman...@vacation.karoshi.comJan 28, 2012 8:30 am 
John PeachJan 28, 2012 8:39 am 
Ryan GelobterJan 28, 2012 7:11 pm 
Jack BatesJan 30, 2012 7:53 am 
Matthew S. CrockerJan 30, 2012 7:55 am 
Carlos AlcantarJan 31, 2012 2:30 pm 
Phil DyerJan 31, 2012 4:38 pm 
Ryan PavelyJan 31, 2012 4:43 pm 
Ronald BonicaJan 31, 2012 5:29 pm 
Carlos AlcantarJan 31, 2012 6:52 pm 
TFMLFeb 1, 2012 7:32 am 
PCFeb 1, 2012 11:53 am 
Robert E. SeastromFeb 2, 2012 2:57 am 
bman...@vacation.karoshi.comFeb 2, 2012 3:22 am 
Subject:Re: US DOJ victim letter
From:Ryan Gelobter (rya@atwgpc.net)
Date:Jan 28, 2012 7:11:28 pm
List:edu.merit.nanog

The e-mail states it was sent to the specific e-mail address because it was listed as the contact in WHOIS. Although you can opt-out from these notices I believe as part of the DNS Changer case the court ordered the FBI to notify ISPs.

On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 10:39 AM, John Peach <john@johnpeach.com>wrote:

On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 16:30:47 +0000 bman@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:

On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:20:08PM -0500, Martin Hannigan wrote:

On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Randy Epstein <nan@hostleasing.net>

wrote:

[snip]

I missed the part where ARIN turned over its address database w/ associatedd registration information to the Fed ... I mean I've always advocated for LEO access, but ther has been significant pushback fromm the community on unfettered access to that data. As I recall, there are even policies and processes to limit/restrict external queries to prevent a DDos of the whois servers. And some fairly strict policies on who gets dumps of the address space. As far as I know (not very far) bundling the address database -and- the registration data are not available to mere mortals.

So - just how DID the Fed get the data w/o violating ARIN policy?

/bill

Ours came from our whois information.