

![]() | Start a set with this search |
![]() | Include this search in one of my sets |
![]() | Exclude this search from one of my sets |
![]() | Permalink to these results Paste this link in email or IM: |
| Atom feed for tracking future search results Paste this URL into your reader: |
107 messages in org.apache.communityRe: Rules for Revolutionaries| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| 55 earlier messages | ||
| Ceki Gülcü | Nov 9, 2002 10:49 am | |
| Ceki Gülcü | Nov 9, 2002 10:58 am | |
| Stefano Mazzocchi | Nov 9, 2002 12:32 pm | |
| James Duncan Davidson | Nov 9, 2002 3:29 pm | |
| James Duncan Davidson | Nov 9, 2002 3:37 pm | |
| Chuck Murcko | Nov 9, 2002 6:07 pm | |
| Rodent of Unusual Size | Nov 10, 2002 5:29 am | |
| Ceki Gülcü | Nov 10, 2002 6:21 am | |
| James Duncan Davidson | Nov 10, 2002 9:14 am | |
| Stefano Mazzocchi | Nov 11, 2002 7:05 pm | |
| Stephen McConnell | Nov 11, 2002 7:26 pm | |
| Sam Ruby | Nov 11, 2002 7:41 pm | |
| Jeff Turner | Nov 11, 2002 7:42 pm | |
| Stephen McConnell | Nov 11, 2002 7:43 pm | |
| Ovidiu Predescu | Nov 11, 2002 9:34 pm | |
| Ovidiu Predescu | Nov 11, 2002 9:35 pm | |
| Sam Ruby | Nov 11, 2002 9:50 pm | |
| Jeff Turner | Nov 11, 2002 11:17 pm | |
| Andrew C. Oliver | Nov 12, 2002 7:18 am | |
| Stefano Mazzocchi | Nov 12, 2002 7:24 am | |
| Martin van den Bemt | Nov 12, 2002 8:18 am | |
| Joe Schaefer | Nov 12, 2002 8:19 am | |
| Jeff Turner | Nov 12, 2002 8:20 am | |
| Andrew C. Oliver | Nov 12, 2002 8:28 am | |
| Henri Yandell | Nov 12, 2002 8:41 am | |
| Costin Manolache | Nov 12, 2002 9:57 am | |
| Costin Manolache | Nov 12, 2002 10:14 am | |
| Craig R. McClanahan | Nov 12, 2002 11:38 am | |
| Andrew C. Oliver | Nov 12, 2002 12:18 pm | |
| Glenn Nielsen | Nov 12, 2002 7:04 pm | |
| Stephen McConnell | Nov 13, 2002 2:23 am | |
| Rodent of Unusual Size | Nov 13, 2002 3:49 am | |
| Rodent of Unusual Size | Nov 13, 2002 3:55 am | |
| Rodent of Unusual Size | Nov 13, 2002 4:02 am | |
| Rodent of Unusual Size | Nov 13, 2002 4:20 am | |
| Stephen McConnell | Nov 13, 2002 4:20 am | |
| Stefano Mazzocchi | Nov 13, 2002 6:44 am | |
| Joe Schaefer | Nov 13, 2002 7:37 am | |
| Rodent of Unusual Size | Nov 13, 2002 8:49 am | |
| Costin Manolache | Nov 13, 2002 10:01 am | |
| Rodent of Unusual Size | Nov 13, 2002 10:15 am | |
| Sam Ruby | Nov 13, 2002 11:16 am | |
| Stefano Mazzocchi | Nov 13, 2002 11:44 am | |
| Costin Manolache | Nov 13, 2002 12:10 pm | |
| Rodent of Unusual Size | Nov 13, 2002 5:37 pm | |
| Roy T. Fielding | Nov 14, 2002 9:54 am | |
| Daniel Rall | Nov 15, 2002 2:44 pm | |
| Sam Ruby | Nov 15, 2002 7:28 pm | |
| Andrew C. Oliver | Nov 15, 2002 8:09 pm | |
| Henri Gomez | Nov 18, 2002 9:56 am | |
| Henri Gomez | Nov 18, 2002 10:00 am | |
| Henri Gomez | Nov 18, 2002 11:26 pm | |

![]() | Permalink for this message Paste this link in email or IM: |
![]() | Permalink for this thread Paste this link in email or IM: |
| Atom feed for this thread Paste this URL into your reader: |
| Subject: | Re: Rules for Revolutionaries | Actions... |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Henri Gomez (hgo...@apache.org) | |
| Date: | Nov 18, 2002 9:56:39 am | |
| List: | org.apache.community | |
Sam Ruby wrote:
Ovidiu Predescu wrote:
I'm glad this actually didn't happen, since it took a long time for the 4.0 branch to become stable and usable. If it weren't for the "legacy" codebase being continually developed, we would have been stuck with a slow 3.2 and a buggy 4.0. I've used Tomcat 3.3 for more than a year before switching to 4.1, and I liked 3.3 a lot for its speed and features.
What would have been more likely to happen is that Tomcat 3.3 would have continued on SourceForge, been known by a different name, had a fully supported servlet 2.3 facade, and would have been known as the production quality servlet engine.
Of course, it could had been a funny thing :)
You should also remember that our friend Pier make many remarks about stability on tomcat 4.x and proposed sometimes ago on tomcat-dev to start a fork to make a minimal but more stable TC 4.X
In retrospect, I think the decision to continue the development on both Tomcat versions was a good one. It let the time solve the frictions. The result is that now we have a very mature Tomcat community, and little of the past problems are reflected today on the mailing list.
I agree, if at anytime, TC 3.3.x was said as obsolete or to be discontinued, I'll had to choose an alternate servlet engine since TC 3.2 was too slow and memory consuming and TC 4.x still not production ready.
But the good thing in making TC 3.3 and 4.x teams continuing their own works was that Tomcat 5 get the best of both part, and was really quickly launched using jakarta-tomcat-connectors as a common sandbox.
Sometimes, when you let 2 teams works in parallel on similar project but different implementation, you avoid that one team fly to another umbrella (ie sf.net) and sus save the community and also you could help making the next revolution by merging good ideas from both projects.







