14 messages in ru.sysoev.nginxRe: php-fastcgi stalling| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Kiril Angov | Apr 10, 2009 6:02 pm | |
| SSSlippy | Apr 11, 2009 6:38 am | |
| Kiril Angov | Apr 11, 2009 6:46 am | |
| Denis Filimonov | Apr 11, 2009 8:20 am | |
| Eugene Lazutkin | Apr 11, 2009 9:06 am | |
| Michael Shadle | Apr 11, 2009 10:26 am | |
| Kiril Angov | Apr 11, 2009 10:54 am | |
| Peter Langhans | Apr 13, 2009 8:07 am | |
| Kiril Angov | Apr 13, 2009 10:17 am | |
| Peter Langhans | Apr 13, 2009 10:38 am | |
| Kiril Angov | Apr 13, 2009 10:48 am | |
| Cliff Wells | Apr 13, 2009 11:17 am | |
| SSSlippy | Apr 13, 2009 11:37 am | |
| Michael Shadle | Apr 13, 2009 1:06 pm |
| Subject: | Re: php-fastcgi stalling | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Peter Langhans (pete...@incipience.co.uk) | |
| Date: | Apr 13, 2009 10:38:53 am | |
| List: | ru.sysoev.nginx | |
did it ever occur to you that your problem might, now or some time later, also concern other people. so your "thank you" together with the fact that you did not bother posting your found solution, sounds quite sarcastic, no matter how much years or decades you are using this list or how much you are trying to post-justify your e-mail conversation.
But probably still stuck in the "I'll tell other people what I found" loop....
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Kiril Angov <kupo...@gmail.com> wrote:
Mr. Peter Langhans, which part of "So thank you, I got my answer." you did not understand as a thank you to the people who wrote to me? I have been subscribed to the list for almost a year and I have read > 70% of the emails and I have been using the nginx during all that time and yes I did have to find rewrite rules, yes I did have special settings but never bothered the list as I knew I can find the answer otherwise and let my asking for when I really needed it. And guess what, I that first email was that time. My question was simple, does anybody know? Because I was pressed by time restrains and wanted to send an email to ask if somebody had the same problem or not. Negative answer is also a helpful answer and I guess that's why people did reply, for which I was NOT sarcastic when I said "thank you" and I did not whine about nobody answering, etc.
For God sake, people...
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Peter Langhans <pete...@incipience.co.uk> wrote:
I know, I did not contribute to this one, but if this is what you liked to know in first place, why don't you take the time, think about it before you hit the send button, think about it again, then one more time, and because it's you one more last time. Think whether it's really what you want to ask THEN send it.
A thank you to all the other guys would be very much appreciated Mr. Kiril A. but then again, maybe you are still thinking about whether to send it... stuck in an infinite loop like your php program unable to process anything any further.
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Kiril Angov <kupo...@gmail.com>
wrote:
That's why I usually hate to ask vague question but after many hours of fixing other things this just top it off. I understand it is difficult to tell what the problem is, but what I was more interested in was whether there is a well know problem. Just want to know if it is justified to dig more seriously into the problem.
So thank you, I got my answer.
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 7:07 PM, Eugene Lazutkin <euge...@gmail.com> wrote:
Circular reference?
On 04/11/2009 08:39 AM, SSSlippy wrote:
Switch to php-fpm
Posted at Nginx Forum: http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?2,976,977#msg-977