* Lars Marius Garshol
| XTM doesn't say that. It says very clearly that "This specification
| places no constraints on how applications interpret scope."
| If you look at section 184.108.40.206 you'll also see that there is nothing
| at all about this issue there.
* Thomas B. Passin
| If you look at section 3.3.1, you will find
| " The <scope> element consists of one or more <topicRef>,
| <resourceRef>, or <subjectIndicatorRef> elements. The union of the
| subjects corresponding to these elements specifies the context in
| which the assignment of the topic characteristic is considered to be
| This was the basis for my remark about OR-ing. How do you interpret
| this paragraph, if not describing the OR interpretation?
Ouch. You are of course right that this does support your
I asked Steve (P.) now, and his recollection was that it should be
OR/any, so presumably the sentence in the terminology section is a
So it seems that I am wrong and you and Murray are right. The SAM
issue is still open, however.