| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Hans A. Aanesen | Nov 3, 2003 12:27 am | |
| Farrukh Najmi | Nov 3, 2003 4:49 am | |
| Hans A. Aanesen | Nov 3, 2003 5:12 am | |
| Weiland, John R. NMIMC GS | Nov 3, 2003 5:13 am | |
| Farrukh Najmi | Nov 3, 2003 6:11 am | |
| Farrukh Najmi | Nov 3, 2003 6:32 am | |
| David RR Webber | Nov 3, 2003 10:42 am | |
| Farrukh Najmi | Nov 3, 2003 10:55 am |
| Subject: | Re: [egov] BCM and eprXML pilots | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Hans A. Aanesen (ha...@iti.as) | |
| Date: | Nov 3, 2003 5:12:21 am | |
| List: | org.oasis-open.lists.egov | |
Hi Farrukh I just feel that the WSDL modeling is the most important part in having legacy system interfaced on Govermental superstructure terms. The greenpages (as in UDDI spesification) do have the API models. I just need these API Meta-models to be stored somewhere in an nasjonal registry. I do not require UDDI, but this kind of register is important.
Best regards Hans
----- Original Message ----- From: "Farrukh Najmi" <Farr...@Sun.COM> To: "Hans A. Aanesen" <ha...@iti.as> Cc: <bc...@lists.oasis-open.org>; <eg...@lists.oasis-open.org>; "Knut Lindelien" <Knut...@nts.no> Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 7:52 AM Subject: Re: [egov] BCM and eprXML pilots
Hans A. Aanesen wrote:
Hi
Thank you for a very fruitful conference.(Specially our workshop)
It is obvious that eprXML will be a very nice "face" for BCM in Governmental organized services in e-Gov SOA. Special interesting is the broader audience in the e-Gov TC and that they need a more governmental and not vendor controlled guidance.
One important topic here is the needed "single sign-on" PKI solutions based on a national repository (UDDI?)
Why do you pre-suppose UDDI here Hans?
Were you aware that UDDI *DOES NOT* provide a repository at all?
I would think that ebXML Registry would be a much better fit for a standards-based national registry/repository. It *DOES* provide a feature rich repository.
I would be glad to explore this further with the team if needed. Thanks.
-- Farrukh
built upon a _not vendor made_ specification of API Meta-models (Web Services).It is crucial that it must be built upon Governmental terms (as EPR).
Such Meta models should be approved by Governments based on recommended certificates from for instance OASIS e-Gov.
It would be nice if we could extend our eprXML pilots on a broader international basis!
We will also come back on sugestions on international pilots.
Best regards
Hans A. Aanesen
EPR-Forum Norway
To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of
the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/egov/members/leave_workgroup.php.





