atom feed11 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.xacmlRE: [xacml] Re: postpone vote on WSPL
FromSent OnAttachments
Anne AndersonSep 16, 2003 7:35 am 
bill parducciSep 16, 2003 7:45 am 
Hal LockhartSep 16, 2003 8:12 am 
Anne AndersonSep 16, 2003 8:47 am 
Polar HumennSep 17, 2003 6:33 am 
Anthony NadalinSep 18, 2003 5:17 am 
bill parducciSep 18, 2003 7:52 am 
Anne AndersonSep 18, 2003 9:41 am 
Anthony NadalinSep 18, 2003 7:16 pm 
Polar HumennSep 19, 2003 6:36 am 
bill parducciSep 19, 2003 8:40 am 
Subject:RE: [xacml] Re: postpone vote on WSPL
From:Polar Humenn (pol@syr.edu)
Date:Sep 17, 2003 6:33:49 am
List:org.oasis-open.lists.xacml

My comments,

I don't think the WSPL document is out of the scope of XACML. It is merely a strict profile of use of XACML for a particular application. SAML does this all the time, creating profiles, so that it will work with a particular technology, like web browsers.

I've read the document, and although I don't condone web services as a viable efficient mechanism for backoffice communications, I don't see anything wrong with it.

My $2 cents.

Cheers, -Polar

On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Anne Anderson wrote:

Colleagues,

These were all private communications, based on a private straw poll by myself of TC members. While WSPL appears to have strong support from a majority of TC members, it appears we do not have the necessary 2/3 majority at this time. Only one objector was specific, saying WSPL is outside the scope of XACML and is inconsistent with WS-Policy. One early public comment was received on the list, also claiming WSPL was outside the scope of XACML.

I am very much in favor of public discussion. I again request that objectors post their objections publicly to xac@lists.oasis-open.org so that the editor and contributors can attempt to resolve them.

If the only objection is that WSPL is outside the scope of XACML, yet members believe it meets the published requirements for a web services policy language, then perhaps we should start a new OASIS TC for it.

Anne

On 16 September, Hal Lockhart writes: RE: [xacml] Re: postpone vote on WSPL

From: "Hal Lockhart" <hloc@bea.com> To: "bill parducci" <bill@overxeer.com>, "XACML TC" <xac@lists.oasis-open.org> Subject: RE: [xacml] Re: postpone vote on WSPL Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 11:34:31 -0400

I haven't seen anything on the list. I take it these have been private communications. Can this discussion be shared on the list? The new OASIS TC process emphasizes the importance of conducting TC discussions on the list.

Hal

-----Original Message----- From: bill parducci [mailto:bill@overxeer.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 11:07 AM To: XACML TC Subject: [xacml] Re: postpone vote on WSPL

ok. consider it postponed.

b

Anne Anderson wrote:

Hal and Bill,

Tim Moses and I would like to request that the vote to make WSPL a Committee Draft, scheduled for this Thursday 18 September, be postponed. We need more time to deal with the objections of some members of our TC.

Anne

To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xacml/members/leave_w

orkgroup.php.

To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xacml/members/leave_workgroup.php.

-- Anne H. Anderson Email: Anne@Sun.COM Sun Microsystems Laboratories 1 Network Drive,UBUR02-311 Tel: 781/442-0928 Burlington, MA 01803-0902 USA Fax: 781/442-1692

To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xacml/members/leave_workgroup.php.