For consistency with other function name structures.
All the best. Tim.
From: Haruyuki Kawabe [mailto:Haru...@unisys.co.jp]
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 7:25 PM
To: Tim Moses
Subject: Re: [xacml-comment] Public Comment
I omitted the CC for 'xacm...@lists.oasis-open.org'
since I'm not a member of the mailing list and sending mails to the list
will be failed. You may forward my mail to the mailing list.
Tim Moses wrote:
Haruyuki - Your observation is correct. Thank you. In addition,
Were introduced in Version 2.
In the interests of consistent naming, perhaps we should change the
Any objections? All the best. Tim.
Most of functions have a name like <datatype>-<functionality>, so It seems
to me that rfc822Name-regexp-match and x500Name-regexp-match are suitable
than the current naming..
Following datatypes and functions are introduced since XACML 2.0:
They are defined in the namespace
and "urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:1.0:function" respectively. They should be
defined in the XACML 2.0 namecpase "urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:2.0" as same
string-concatenate and uri-string-concatenate.