atom feed15 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-currentRe: Someone needs to re-develop "Soft...
FromSent OnAttachments
Karl DenningerMar 8, 1998 5:10 pm 
John KellyMar 8, 1998 6:14 pm 
Jason YoungMar 8, 1998 6:37 pm 
Nate WilliamsMar 8, 1998 6:48 pm 
John KellyMar 8, 1998 7:04 pm 
John KellyMar 8, 1998 7:08 pm 
Nate WilliamsMar 8, 1998 7:15 pm 
Jonathan LemonMar 8, 1998 7:48 pm 
TomMar 8, 1998 9:05 pm 
TomMar 8, 1998 11:56 pm 
Poul-Henning KampMar 9, 1998 1:33 am 
Karl DenningerMar 9, 1998 3:39 am 
Karl DenningerMar 9, 1998 3:47 am 
Poul-Henning KampMar 9, 1998 4:12 am 
Terry LambertMar 10, 1998 11:41 am 
Subject:Re: Someone needs to re-develop "Softupdates"
From:John Kelly (ja@cetlink.net)
Date:Mar 8, 1998 7:08:57 pm
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-current

On Sun, 8 Mar 1998 19:48:56 -0700, Nate Williams <na@mt.sri.com> wrote:

It's amazing how some of the same people who decry commercializing FreeBSD with donor control of funding have no objection to Kirk's commercial hooks.

Sad isn't it....

Score 1 for the GPL.

The GPL has nothing to do with this.

So you say ...

This is simply a commercial entity that has paid Kirk that would like to not having to re-integrate this into FreeBSD as changes are made.

But then you say that? If all FreeBSD was GPLed Kirk could not demand that anyone license softupdates. So why do you say GPL has nothing to do with it?

-- Browser war over, Mozilla now free.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message