Messages per Month
37 messages in org.gnome.foundation-listRe: Code of conduct (bis)| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Dave Neary | Dec 1, 2006 6:02 am | |
| Murray Cumming | Dec 1, 2006 7:05 am | |
| Adrian Custer | Dec 1, 2006 7:36 am | |
| Dave Neary | Dec 1, 2006 9:31 am | |
| Murray Cumming | Dec 1, 2006 9:44 am | |
| Danilo Šegan | Dec 1, 2006 10:43 am | |
| Murray Cumming | Dec 1, 2006 11:03 am | |
| Anne Østergaard | Dec 1, 2006 11:11 am | |
| Glynn Foster | Dec 1, 2006 12:24 pm | |
| Murray Cumming | Dec 1, 2006 12:34 pm | |
| Mariano Suárez-Alvarez | Dec 1, 2006 7:02 pm | |
| Alan Horkan | Dec 1, 2006 9:06 pm | |
| Dave Neary | Dec 2, 2006 1:24 am | |
| Alan Horkan | Dec 2, 2006 2:02 am | |
| Johannes Schmid | Dec 2, 2006 5:21 am | |
| Quim Gil | Dec 2, 2006 5:55 am | |
| Alan Horkan | Dec 2, 2006 6:29 am | |
| Danilo Šegan | Dec 3, 2006 1:35 pm | |
| Adam Schreiber | Dec 3, 2006 1:47 pm | |
| Philip Van Hoof | Dec 4, 2006 8:50 am | |
| Olav Vitters | Dec 4, 2006 9:53 am | |
| Philip Van Hoof | Dec 4, 2006 10:27 am | |
| Olav Vitters | Dec 4, 2006 10:49 am | |
| Murray Cumming | Dec 4, 2006 11:44 am | |
| Philip Van Hoof | Dec 4, 2006 12:13 pm | |
| Andrew Sobala | Dec 4, 2006 12:49 pm | |
| Elijah Newren | Dec 4, 2006 2:53 pm | |
| Jeff Waugh | Dec 4, 2006 3:02 pm | |
| Telsa Gwynne | Dec 8, 2006 1:26 pm | |
| Dave Neary | Dec 8, 2006 2:42 pm | |
| Quim Gil | Dec 8, 2006 3:39 pm | |
| Alan Horkan | Dec 10, 2006 7:02 pm | |
| Jeff Waugh | Dec 10, 2006 7:42 pm | |
| Quim Gil | Dec 12, 2006 3:58 pm | |
| Quim Gil | Dec 12, 2006 4:07 pm | |
| Murray Cumming | Dec 14, 2006 2:59 am | |
| Murray Cumming | Jan 16, 2007 6:40 am |
| Subject: | Re: Code of conduct (bis) | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Telsa Gwynne (hob...@aloss.ukuu.org.uk) | |
| Date: | Dec 8, 2006 1:26:35 pm | |
| List: | org.gnome.foundation-list | |
Ar Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 03:02:42PM +0100, ysgrifennodd Dave Neary:
The feeling of the board (a majority opinion, rather than unanimous) is that the code of conduct would be more hurt than helped by being pushed by us. Its adoption really needs to be bottom-up.
The issue is divisive, even within the board, and I don't think that we can come out as a group and say "the board thinks we should do this" -
Would it be possible to find out who felt which way? I can't see it in the minutes, and this is very much a deciding issue for me when it comes to voting for the new board.
Telsa