21 messages in org.apache.jackrabbit.oak-devRe: Internal content in Oak| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Jukka Zitting | Jul 12, 2012 4:11 am | |
| Julian Reschke | Jul 12, 2012 4:18 am | |
| Michael Dürig | Jul 12, 2012 4:22 am | |
| Thomas Mueller | Jul 12, 2012 4:44 am | |
| Jukka Zitting | Jul 12, 2012 5:15 am | |
| Angela Schreiber | Jul 17, 2012 4:01 am | |
| Jukka Zitting | Jul 18, 2012 7:16 am | |
| Thomas Mueller | Jul 19, 2012 12:21 am | |
| Stefan Guggisberg | Jul 19, 2012 1:18 am | |
| Jukka Zitting | Jul 19, 2012 1:37 am | |
| Angela Schreiber | Jul 19, 2012 1:54 am | |
| Jukka Zitting | Jul 19, 2012 1:57 am | |
| Jukka Zitting | Jul 19, 2012 2:09 am | |
| Thomas Mueller | Jul 19, 2012 2:25 am | |
| Stefan Guggisberg | Jul 19, 2012 2:26 am | |
| Thomas Mueller | Jul 19, 2012 2:29 am | |
| Jukka Zitting | Jul 19, 2012 2:36 am | |
| Angela Schreiber | Jul 19, 2012 2:59 am | |
| Jukka Zitting | Jul 19, 2012 3:26 am | |
| Alexander Klimetschek | Jul 19, 2012 11:58 am | |
| Jukka Zitting | Jul 19, 2012 2:09 pm |
| Subject: | Re: Internal content in Oak | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Angela Schreiber (anch...@adobe.com) | |
| Date: | Jul 19, 2012 2:59:08 am | |
| List: | org.apache.jackrabbit.oak-dev | |
hi jukka
was it possible for you to share the known set of special properties with the team?
See the end of my message from yesterday.
oh, i see... i got that wrong since the original mail and the issue gave me the impression that there already exists quite some internal content.
if i understand you properly it's currently just 1 internal content property ":childOrder" and for this case you already stated in your previous post, that it was better to cover this with an API method.
for the potential cases you listed i agree with you that it's best to decide once we actually have to address them and work on the implementation.
what's your preference regarding the corresponding issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-182
shall we resolve it? the current proposal doesn't seem to cover the conclusion from the mailing list, right?
regards angela