atom feed5 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.security-leadersRE: Welcome to security-leaders
FromSent OnAttachments
Eve L. MalerFeb 16, 2001 8:07 am 
Jeremy EpsteinFeb 16, 2001 8:15 am 
Darren PlattFeb 16, 2001 2:34 pm 
Philip Hallam-BakerFeb 16, 2001 4:10 pm.bin
Krishna SankarFeb 16, 2001 11:41 pm 
Subject:RE: Welcome to security-leaders
From:Darren Platt (dpl@securant.com)
Date:Feb 16, 2001 2:34:15 pm
List:org.oasis-open.lists.security-leaders

That sounds like a good approach to me. It would be great if everyone read the issues list as well - that's where the bulk of the work is being done currently. If you have a comment or suggestion, it may be listed there already. This issues list is included with Strawman 2 in the zipfile you can find here:

http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/security-use/200102/msg00045.html

Thanks,

Darren

-----Original Message----- From: Eve L. Maler [mailto:eve.@east.sun.com] Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 8:09 AM To: secu@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Welcome to security-leaders

Hi folks-- This list replaces the old security-editors list. I'd like us to conduct planning discussions here (such as how to structure the F2F agenda, planning "leaders-only" telecons, etc.). For now, I would like people to respond to my mail of yesterday if they haven't already responded to me privately:

==== In the next telecon, I will be asking for motions to name the spec, and I will propose to consider them in order of apparent popularity given the poll results. If the top contender has majority support, it will win. Then all attempts to discuss it will be ruled out of order.

On the matter of what we should be spending our time on, I'd like to ask the subgroup leaders to take up Strawman #2 with their groups, and provide feedback to the use-case group as soon as possible. What requirements are missing? What requirements are too implementation-focused? What requirements should be out of scope? I'd like the "technical theme" of the next telecon to be requirements, with Darren giving a report on the substance of the strawman and the other subgroups giving a report on their reactions.

Since we haven't really used this list for leader communications yet, I would appreciate it if I could hear back from all the subgroup leaders with their thoughts on this approach. ====

Eve