5 messages in net.sourceforge.lists.courier-maildropRe: [maildropl] maildrop, Solaris 8, ...
FromSent OnAttachments
Sam CarletonSep 18, 2004 12:10 pm 
Alex S MooreSep 18, 2004 2:29 pm 
Sam VarshavchikSep 18, 2004 4:05 pm 
Tony EarnshawSep 18, 2004 8:07 pm 
Devin RubiaSep 20, 2004 8:00 am 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:Re: [maildropl] maildrop, Solaris 8, and libstdc++.so.2.10.0Actions...
From:Tony Earnshaw (ton@billy.demon.nl)
Date:Sep 18, 2004 8:07:45 pm
List:net.sourceforge.lists.courier-maildrop

lør, 18.09.2004 kl. 23.29 skrev Alex S Moore:

On Sat, 18 Sep 2004 15:10:40 -0400 Sam Carleton <scar@miltonstreet.com> wrote:

I am totally lost at this point; if I understand ldd correctly, it is saying that it is looking in /usr/local/lib for the c++ library, which is where that library is located. Why cann't maildrop find it?

You may have LD_LIBRARY_PATH set when you run ldd. What you probably want is `dump -Lv <full path to object>` and look at the RUNPATH variable. Depending on the tool that you are using, use LD_OPTIONS or LD_RUN_PATH to set this.

You may want to use either gmake or/usr/ccs/bin/make for make. gamke and LD_OPTIONS work for me with maildrop.

Hmmm ... someone on the Openldap list muttered something about crle as appropriate for Solaris lib environments (but was smartly rapped on his fingers by QMG). On RHAS/RHEL3 I use ld.so.conf/ldconfig.

Nevertheless, OP might like to look at crle.

--Tonni

-- "Life is short and memory can be simply be bent, like"

The late Julius Z. Winkelthrop III, whilst confronted with his own shortcomings.

... I may go out tonight ... ... it's just amazing how fair people can be ...