 | Start a set with this search |
 | Include this search in one of my sets |
 | Exclude this search from one of my sets |
 | Permalink to these results Paste this link in email or IM: |
 | Atom feed for tracking future search results Paste this URL into your reader: |
37 messages in org.gnome.foundation-listRe: Code of conduct (bis)| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Dave Neary | Dec 1, 2006 6:02 am | |
| Murray Cumming | Dec 1, 2006 7:05 am | |
| Adrian Custer | Dec 1, 2006 7:36 am | |
| Dave Neary | Dec 1, 2006 9:31 am | |
| Murray Cumming | Dec 1, 2006 9:44 am | |
| Danilo Šegan | Dec 1, 2006 10:43 am | |
| Murray Cumming | Dec 1, 2006 11:03 am | |
| Anne Østergaard | Dec 1, 2006 11:11 am | |
| Glynn Foster | Dec 1, 2006 12:24 pm | |
| Murray Cumming | Dec 1, 2006 12:34 pm | |
| Mariano Suárez-Alvarez | Dec 1, 2006 7:02 pm | |
| Alan Horkan | Dec 1, 2006 9:06 pm | |
| Dave Neary | Dec 2, 2006 1:24 am | |
| Alan Horkan | Dec 2, 2006 2:02 am | |
| Johannes Schmid | Dec 2, 2006 5:21 am | |
| Quim Gil | Dec 2, 2006 5:55 am | |
| Alan Horkan | Dec 2, 2006 6:29 am | |
| Danilo Šegan | Dec 3, 2006 1:35 pm | |
| Adam Schreiber | Dec 3, 2006 1:47 pm | |
| Philip Van Hoof | Dec 4, 2006 8:50 am | |
| Olav Vitters | Dec 4, 2006 9:53 am | |
| Philip Van Hoof | Dec 4, 2006 10:27 am | |
| Olav Vitters | Dec 4, 2006 10:49 am | |
| Murray Cumming | Dec 4, 2006 11:44 am | |
| Philip Van Hoof | Dec 4, 2006 12:13 pm | |
| Andrew Sobala | Dec 4, 2006 12:49 pm | |
| Elijah Newren | Dec 4, 2006 2:53 pm | |
| Jeff Waugh | Dec 4, 2006 3:02 pm | |
| Telsa Gwynne | Dec 8, 2006 1:26 pm | |
| Dave Neary | Dec 8, 2006 2:42 pm | |
| Quim Gil | Dec 8, 2006 3:39 pm | |
| Alan Horkan | Dec 10, 2006 7:02 pm | |
| Jeff Waugh | Dec 10, 2006 7:42 pm | |
| Quim Gil | Dec 12, 2006 3:58 pm | |
| Quim Gil | Dec 12, 2006 4:07 pm | |
| Murray Cumming | Dec 14, 2006 2:59 am | |
| Murray Cumming | Jan 16, 2007 6:40 am |
| Permalink for this message Paste this link in email or IM: |
| Permalink for this thread Paste this link in email or IM: |
| Atom feed for this thread Paste this URL into your reader: |
| Subject: | Re: Code of conduct (bis) | Actions... |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Olav Vitters (ol...@bkor.dhs.org) | |
| Date: | Dec 4, 2006 9:53:26 am | |
| List: | org.gnome.foundation-list | |
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 05:50:53PM +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 20:04 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 19:43 +0100, Danilo Šegan wrote:
Today at 18:44, Murray Cumming wrote:
But yes, I'll try the endorsement strategy if I have to.
I prefer Adrian Custer's suggestion.
Tell me where to sign! :)
Let's see how this works out: http://live.gnome.org/CodeOfConduct/Signatures
I signed the code of conduct under the strict condition that there is no official enforcement of these principles, and that it should not be interpreted like a legal document.
s/condition/assumption/ ?
If that changes, then please automatically unsign me first. I even wouldn't care if every single other GNOME contributor would have signed it. Even if that happens, I still wouldn't agree with an official enforcement of the principles.
I did not agree with the initial version of the CoC. However, the current can be interpreted as 'don't be a jerk'[1]. Why would you want to accept such persons?
My reason for that is very simple: GNOME is a multicultural world event happening. It welcomes peoples from every imaginable culture. It's not my task to question the (maybe strange for me) principles of a foreign culture. It's not my task to exclude people from our community based on cultural differences.
If some culture thinks it is ok to be a jerk, then I do not want to deal with them. Well, it is more that I do not accept them being jerks. Either change or be gone.
In the CoC you can see it *is* used for GNOME Bugzilla, and unfortunately 1 person has been banned because of his behaviour (after warnings). I see the CoC as a easy reference I can point to. I have no problem banning someone from GNOME Bugzilla or any mailinglist if some person cannot behave themselves; for me the CoC is a pre-warning. This only for extreme/obvious cases, I do not like nitpicking.
Automatically unsign me once it becomes an official enforcement. I repeat again: my signature is not a tool to make these principles official. Not at all.
I suggest you do that yourself when it happens.
[1] replace with appropriate female version -- Regards, Olav