10 messages in net.java.dev.woodstock.usersRe: Woodstock update
FromSent OnAttachments
John Jullion-CeccarelliNov 3, 2008 11:59 pm 
Felipe JaekelNov 4, 2008 6:57 am 
Jaider Fernando RodriguezNov 5, 2008 5:37 pm 
autozoomNov 6, 2008 12:52 am 
Paolo ProniNov 6, 2008 12:59 am 
autozoomNov 6, 2008 6:05 am 
Paolo ProniNov 6, 2008 6:31 am 
Felipe JaekelNov 6, 2008 3:07 pm 
Federico Vela [PaySett Corp]Nov 10, 2008 7:28 am 
JokersAug 12, 2009 11:48 pm 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:Re: Woodstock updateActions...
From:autozoom (cion@yahoo.com)
Date:Nov 6, 2008 6:05:24 am
List:net.java.dev.woodstock.users

yes we can and maybe we'll be forced to, but what about the visual approach to developing web inteface? It is (was...) the real point of strength of Woodstock components and Netbeans I think

Paolo Proni wrote:

Maybe we can give a look at RichFaces by RedHat...

I think at least Sun now owes us a fast update on what we are going to do with our production deployments based upon Woodstock. Will there continue to be a visuall web framework for Netbeans? Do we need to switch to Icefaces, Quipukit, Infragistics or some other framework?

We cannot wait another 2 months, really!

--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user@woodstock.dev.java.net For additional commands, e-mail: user@woodstock.dev.java.net

-- View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Woodstock-update-tp20317701p20361654.html Sent from the Project Woodstock - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user@woodstock.dev.java.net For additional commands, e-mail: user@woodstock.dev.java.net