3 messages in net.java.dev.jna.usersRe: [jna-users] jna and daemonizing
FromSent OnAttachments
Paul PhillipsDec 30, 2008 8:53 am 
Wayne MeissnerDec 30, 2008 11:38 am 
Paul PhillipsDec 30, 2008 12:15 pm 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:Re: [jna-users] jna and daemonizingActions...
From:Paul Phillips (pau@improving.org)
Date:Dec 30, 2008 12:15:42 pm
List:net.java.dev.jna.users

On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 05:39:28AM +1000, Wayne Meissner wrote:

In general: JNA+fork == bad.

Ah. This would point toward starting fuse in foreground mode, and backgrounding
the entire JVM. The low-tech implementation of that (adding & to the command line invocation) is
working, thanks. Brief googling is not revealing a programmatic way to background it, and indeed the
usual unix way to do that does involve forking, so I might end up requiring a small wrapper.

-- Paul Phillips | Simplicity and elegance are unpopular because Apatheist | they require hard work and discipline to achieve Empiricist | and education to be appreciated. up hill, pi pals! | -- Dijkstra

--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user@jna.dev.java.net For additional commands, e-mail: user@jna.dev.java.net