atom feed15 messages in at.iem.pd-listRe: [PD] execution order for ~ object...
FromSent OnAttachments
Damian StewartSep 25, 2008 4:51 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigSep 25, 2008 5:21 am 
Claude Heiland-AllenSep 25, 2008 5:29 am 
Thomas GrillSep 25, 2008 6:16 am 
Frank BarknechtSep 25, 2008 6:16 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigSep 25, 2008 6:21 am 
Thomas GrillSep 25, 2008 9:31 am 
hard offSep 26, 2008 6:31 am 
IOhannes m zmölnigSep 26, 2008 8:44 am 
Damian StewartSep 26, 2008 9:24 am 
IOhannes m zmölnigSep 26, 2008 9:37 am 
Damian StewartSep 26, 2008 10:11 am 
IOhannes m zmölnigSep 26, 2008 10:13 am 
IOhannes m zmölnigSep 26, 2008 10:14 am 
Claude Heiland-AllenSep 26, 2008 10:24 am 
Subject:Re: [PD] execution order for ~ objects that output messages
From:IOhannes m zmölnig (zmoe@iem.at)
Date:Sep 26, 2008 8:44:37 am
List:at.iem.pd-list

hard off wrote:

an easy way might be to put a [bang~] in a subpatch, so that it is triggered after the [env~ ] objects, and then connect each [env~] to the right inlet of a [f ]...then you can bang the floats with [t b b] from the [bang~]

well, but the [bang~] will have the same problem: it might trigger before or after [env~] has updated it's value.

but of course you proposal to use another source for synching the outputs is the way to go.

fgmasdr IOhannes

_______________________________________________ Pd-l@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list