| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Graham Smith | Aug 18, 2005 7:12 am | |
| Don Brown | Aug 18, 2005 8:01 am | |
| Graham Smith | Aug 18, 2005 8:31 am | |
| Craig McClanahan | Aug 18, 2005 9:31 am | |
| Mark Benussi | Aug 18, 2005 9:36 am | |
| John Martyniak | Aug 18, 2005 12:07 pm | |
| Michael Jouravlev | Aug 18, 2005 12:32 pm | |
| Graham Smith | Aug 18, 2005 12:42 pm | |
| Leon Rosenberg | Aug 18, 2005 12:44 pm | |
| Leon Rosenberg | Aug 18, 2005 12:52 pm | |
| Graham Smith | Aug 18, 2005 1:05 pm | |
| Michael Jouravlev | Aug 18, 2005 1:10 pm | |
| Luiz Godoy | Aug 18, 2005 1:21 pm | |
| Leon Rosenberg | Aug 18, 2005 1:27 pm | |
| Eduardo Ribeiro da Silva | Aug 18, 2005 1:32 pm | |
| Dhar...@ubs.com | Aug 18, 2005 2:10 pm | |
| Peter Maas | Aug 18, 2005 10:41 pm | |
| Mitchell, Steven C | Aug 19, 2005 5:29 am | |
| Craig McClanahan | Aug 19, 2005 2:52 pm |
| Subject: | AW: Struts with XSLT | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Leon Rosenberg (stru...@anotheria.net) | |
| Date: | Aug 18, 2005 12:44:55 pm | |
| List: | org.apache.struts.user | |
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Michael Jouravlev [mailto:jmi...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. August 2005 21:33 An: Struts Users Mailing List Betreff: Re: Struts with XSLT
On 8/18/05, Graham Smith <gra...@crazysquirrel.com> wrote:
* Should I just stop fighting city hall and abandon XSLT in
favour of JSP?
Yes :-) Really. We did it a year ago, and gained A LOT of performance. Not to mention that XSLT is much less powerful then jsp (custom tags, etc). At least as long, as you are using an existing renderer.
No. XML/XSLT is more flexible than JSP and has been supported bunch of other markup tecnhologies like XML, XHTML and XPath for a long time.
And are very much slower to.
Keep it if it works. Don't forget that modern browsers can accept XML and have built-in XSLT processor. So, you can send your serialized bean data as XML with linked XSLT stylesheet with linked CSS stylesheet.
Now this is an urban legend :-) Each browser support it it's own way. Not to mention each version of the redmond browser supports ist own extensions. None of them are compatible.
* Perhaps it's still a little early to say exactly how Struts 2.x will turn out but will the idea of view technology independence be maintained? * If Struts 2.x doesn't (essentiall) force us to use something akin to JSF will XSLT still be a viable option?
You can do it in Struts 1.x too. Instead of forwarding to JSP page just stick XML (or XML/XSLT already processed into HTML) into response object and return null from an Action class. Apparently, you would use ActionForm for input only with request scope, and store your app data somewhere in the session or in database.
Actually it's better to write out the dom object (if you have one, but you should, if you seriously want xslt/xml). I would also look into rendering with SAX, it could probably give you 40-50% more performance then dom rendering.
Regards Leon





