3 messages in org.apache.jackrabbit.usersRe: Rebuild Lucene Index For Clustere...
FromSent OnAttachments
Noah VihinenOct 12, 2007 8:30 am 
Noah VihinenOct 18, 2007 6:57 am 
Dominique PfisterOct 18, 2007 7:04 am 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:Re: Rebuild Lucene Index For Clustered NodeActions...
From:Dominique Pfister (domi@day.com)
Date:Oct 18, 2007 7:04:51 am
List:org.apache.jackrabbit.users

Hi Noah,

sorry for the delay, your post must have skipped my attention.

On 18/10/2007, Noah Vihinen <nvih@maven.net> wrote:

Our current understanding is this. No matter what, when search indexes are removed on a clustered jackrabbit node, the indexes are rebuilt from the persistent node/property/value states in the DB, ignoring the journal table. Following that, everything from the local journal revision number (in the revision file) up to the latest existing revision is replayed. If the revision file has been removed, a new one is created with revision 0, which results in every entry in the journal table being replayed.

Is all of this correct?

Yes, this is all correct. As a consequence, if the search index is rebuilt on startup because it's missing or corrupt, even though it is already accurate, the index will again be affected by unseen journal table entries.

Kind regards Dominique