atom feed32 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-archRe: 4.x compatibilty.. Was: MFC of rcNG?
FromSent OnAttachments
Doug BartonJun 15, 2002 12:14 pm 
Gordon TetlowJun 16, 2002 9:58 am 
Doug BartonJun 16, 2002 11:01 am 
Julian ElischerJun 16, 2002 1:24 pm 
Doug BartonJun 16, 2002 1:50 pm 
Nik ClaytonJun 16, 2002 2:39 pm 
Doug BartonJun 16, 2002 3:07 pm 
Mike MakonnenJun 17, 2002 2:10 am 
Dag-Erling SmorgravJun 17, 2002 2:32 am 
Sheldon HearnJun 17, 2002 9:01 am 
Garance A DrosihnJun 17, 2002 11:48 am 
Mike MakonnenJun 17, 2002 4:51 pm 
Giorgos KeramidasJun 17, 2002 7:49 pm 
Sheldon HearnJun 18, 2002 1:29 am 
Doug BartonJun 18, 2002 2:06 am 
Mike MakonnenJun 18, 2002 5:04 am 
Sheldon HearnJun 18, 2002 5:21 am 
Trish LynchJun 18, 2002 6:04 am 
Mike MakonnenJun 18, 2002 6:05 am 
Sheldon HearnJun 18, 2002 6:12 am 
Mike MakonnenJun 18, 2002 7:26 am 
Doug BartonJun 18, 2002 10:54 am 
Sheldon HearnJun 18, 2002 11:06 am 
Doug BartonJun 18, 2002 11:23 am 
Sheldon HearnJun 18, 2002 11:35 am 
Doug BartonJun 18, 2002 11:41 am 
Gordon TetlowJun 18, 2002 12:53 pm 
Nik ClaytonJun 18, 2002 2:40 pm 
Doug BartonJun 18, 2002 3:17 pm 
Nik ClaytonJun 18, 2002 3:27 pm 
Garance A DrosihnJun 18, 2002 6:00 pm 
Julian ElischerJun 18, 2002 6:20 pm 
Subject:Re: 4.x compatibilty.. Was: MFC of rcNG?
From:Doug Barton (Dou@FreeBSD.org)
Date:Jun 18, 2002 11:41:54 am
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-arch

Sheldon Hearn wrote:

On Tue, 18 Jun 2002 11:23:38 MST, Doug Barton wrote:

I would also like to suggest at this point that we hold off on further discussion of this nature till we flip the switch to make rc_ng the default. Rather than speculate as to how big a hill we have to climb, let's actually start the trip, and see how it looks after day 1.

That makes a lot of sense.

Thanks, I try to do that occasionally, just to keep people off balance. :)y

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message