18 messages in com.redhat.k12osnRe: [K12OSN] State of K12LTSP?
FromSent OnAttachments
Patrick FlemingDec 27, 2007 4:16 pm 
Mel WadeDec 27, 2007 4:55 pm 
Peter ScheieDec 27, 2007 4:57 pm 
mont...@cox.netDec 27, 2007 6:39 pm 
Mark TrimbleDec 28, 2007 8:04 am 
Luis MontesDec 28, 2007 8:42 am 
"Terrell Prudé Jr."Dec 28, 2007 10:23 am 
R. Scott BelfordDec 28, 2007 11:29 am 
Eric HarrisonJan 9, 2008 10:29 pm 
Robert ArkiletianJan 10, 2008 12:33 am 
Eric HarrisonJan 11, 2008 12:27 pm 
Kemp, LeviJan 11, 2008 2:15 pm 
Rob OwensJan 11, 2008 3:26 pm 
Eric HarrisonJan 11, 2008 10:01 pm 
"Terrell Prudé Jr."Jan 12, 2008 11:27 pm 
mont...@cox.netJan 14, 2008 8:15 am 
David TraskJan 15, 2008 7:01 am 
ImanJan 19, 2008 5:27 am 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:Re: [K12OSN] State of K12LTSP?Actions...
From:"Terrell Prudé Jr." (micr@cmosnetworks.com)
Date:Jan 12, 2008 11:27:16 pm
List:com.redhat.k12osn

I just did a small one here in Las Vegas, NV, for a private party, using K12LTSP 5.0EL, while on "vacation" visiting my Dad. I'm emailing you from that box right now. And yes, it is a small business, not a school. BTW, yes, the CentOS 5.1 "Perfect Desktop" instructions over at www.howtoforge.com work very nicely with it.

Damn, this stuff's good....

--TP

Rob Owens wrote:

Hey Eric, good to hear from you again!

You know the thought crossed my mind that until LTSP 5 is integrated into
Fedora, maybe the EL versions of K12LTSP would be enough for everybody (and
cease working on Fedora/LTSP4.2 based K12LTSP). Just a thought. I'm sure the
Fedora users will have something to say about it. But I'm pretty happy with my
K12LTSP 5.0EL

Thanks for all your hard work.

On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 10:30:17PM -0800, Eric Harrison wrote:

Here is the official state of the union:

1) The fundamental flaw with K12LTSP is that is has mostly been me doing the grunt work. This is probably obvious, I'm stating it just to make sure that it is.

2) Point #1 has burned me out. This is probably obvious, I'm stating it just to make sure that it is.

3) I've been working long and hard, mostly behind the scenes, to fix #1 and #2. Unless you are paying really close attention, that is probably not obvious.

4) As part of #3, I personally helped to spec out the first version of Edubuntu and have attended about half of the Ubuntu Developer Summits. I've done my best to make friends with the fine folks at skolelinux, debian-edu, revolution linux, and anyone who is a "competitor" to K12LTSP. I've preached to the choir about how much we all have in common and how important it is that we all work together. These are not our competitors, these are our bothers-in-arms....

5) I've been swamped with personal & work stuff and it has been hard to carve out large tracks of time to do K12LTSP work. Building and testing new K12LTSP releases takes huge amounts of time. Hence K12LTSP versions 5.1EL, 7 & 8 are still sitting in the "testing" directory.

6) If you are a Fedora hacker, you may have noticed the LTSP5 packages trickling into the Fedora repositories. Hopes are that F9 will have fully-functional LTSP5 support. From a purely optimistic point-of-view, I hope that the FUDcon will result in fully-functional LTSP5 packages for F8.

7) This weekend I will be at the Fedora FUDcon (see points #1-4, 6). If you happen to make it to North Carolina this weekend, come and help us do some hacking.