atom feed21 messages in at.iem.pd-listRe: [PD] tabwriteat~ object
FromSent OnAttachments
Frank BarknechtAug 3, 2009 5:50 am.tgz
Miller PucketteAug 3, 2009 12:30 pm 
Jonathan WilkesAug 3, 2009 1:46 pm 
ypatiosAug 3, 2009 2:13 pm 
Frank BarknechtAug 3, 2009 2:36 pm 
Frank BarknechtAug 3, 2009 2:44 pm 
ypatiosAug 3, 2009 3:43 pm 
Jaime OliverAug 3, 2009 3:51 pm 
Matt BarberAug 3, 2009 4:44 pm 
Chris McCormickAug 3, 2009 5:00 pm 
Charles HenryAug 4, 2009 6:00 am 
Frank BarknechtAug 4, 2009 6:21 am 
Miller PucketteAug 4, 2009 8:01 am 
hard offAug 6, 2009 3:16 am 
Miller PucketteAug 6, 2009 9:41 am 
Frank BarknechtAug 6, 2009 10:06 am 
Charles HenryAug 6, 2009 10:31 am 
Mike Moser-BoothAug 6, 2009 11:03 am 
Frank BarknechtAug 6, 2009 12:01 pm 
Matt BarberAug 7, 2009 6:42 am 
Derek HolzerAug 7, 2009 7:23 am 
Subject:Re: [PD] tabwriteat~ object
From:Matt Barber (brbr@gmail.com)
Date:Aug 7, 2009 6:42:19 am
List:at.iem.pd-list

Hallo, Miller Puckette hat gesagt: // Miller Puckette wrote:

Hmm, tabindex~ diesn't make it clear that stuff is actually going into the table.

With tabindex~ I also would assume, that I'm *getting* the value at a certain index position, tabread~ style.

vtabwrite~ sounds OK, as do tabpoke~ or tabput~ or tabwriteto~ ... ?

I think, vtabwrite~ maybe could be used to make a "v"-version of tabwrite~, by which I mean something, that acts correctly with clock-delayed messages as vsnapshot~, vline~ etc. do.

The "v" could also stand for "variable," as in [vd~]. Could you have [vtabwrite~] and [vtabwrite4~]? The interpolation scheme could get a little tricky... I think we discussed this a few months ago when someone asked for amounted to a variable [delwrite~] with interpolation.

Matt

_______________________________________________ Pd-l@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list