[p4] Perforce - Remote access performance - Yariv Sheizaf - com.perforce.perforce-user

3 messages in com.perforce.perforce-user[p4] Perforce - Remote access perform...

From	Sent On	Attachments
joe nguyen	16 May 2000 13:49
Yariv Sheizaf	16 May 2000 23:35
Yariv Sheizaf	17 May 2000 02:00

Subject:	[p4] Perforce - Remote access performance
From:	Yariv Sheizaf (yar...@cimatron.co.il)
Date:	05/16/2000 11:35:49 PM
List:	com.perforce.perforce-user

Joe,

I managed (for two years) double sites Perforce based system, of 100 users.

The developers were located in both sites, connected with 1MB peer-to-peer line - and the remote site (this one that the server was NOT located there) users worked in the same performance (according to their feeling, in fact it was reduced by 10%) without any problem.

Note : This was one of the main reasons to choose Perforce - I did , at the same time, evaluation to ClearCase and Perforce - and Clearcase (with its features "multisite" and "snapshot" tools) failed - it has not commercial performance.

* My sites were on the same clock - I had not time synchornization problems. I think you must plan it !

Yariv

-----Original Message----- From: joe nguyen [SMTP:jtnguyen at cisco.com] Sent: Tue, May 16, 2000 10:50 PM To: perforce-user at perforce.com Subject: [p4] Perforce - Remote access performance

Hello,

I am evaluating Perforce to support the development that consisting of multiple groups from various locations (East and west coast of US, Europe, etc...) and about approximately up to 200 developers. I would like to know if any of you have experience implementing Perforce of your site that support a similiar configuration. Any input (pros and cons) are greatly appreciated.

Thanks